[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <sgomjvhwnnbvuskxqfybczvxtwn2lourr5eq4mw4qyxp5s6kzc@ccgx4wn5wqi3>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 09:54:33 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@....qualcomm.com>, robh@...nel.org,
srini@...nel.org, amahesh@....qualcomm.com, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org, andersson@...nel.org, konradybcio@...nel.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 5/5] arm64: dts: qcom: glymur-crd: Enable ADSP and CDSP
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 10:55:24AM +0100, Konrad Dybcio wrote:
> On 1/29/26 1:13 AM, Sibi Sankar wrote:
> > Enable ADSP and CDSP on Glymur CRD board.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sibi Sankar <sibi.sankar@....qualcomm.com>
> > ---
> > arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts | 14 ++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts
> > index 0899214465ac..0eed4faa8b07 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/glymur-crd.dts
> > @@ -487,6 +487,20 @@ &pon_resin {
> > status = "okay";
> > };
> >
> > +&remoteproc_adsp {
> > + firmware-name = "qcom/glymur/adsp.mbn",
> > + "qcom/glymur/adsp_dtb.mbn";
> > +
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
> > +
> > +&remoteproc_cdsp {
> > + firmware-name = "qcom/glymur/cdsp.mbn",
> > + "qcom/glymur/cdsp_dtb.mbn";
> > +
> > + status = "okay";
> > +};
>
> Please make sure it gets to L-F (only Kaanapali is there right now)
>
> Reviewed-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
Hmm, looking at x1e80100-crd which references qcom/x1e80100/adsp.mbn,
but the firmware in linux-firmware is (now) targeting IoT devices,
should we use WoA-like names for firmware on Glymur CRD instead
(qcadsp-something.mbn). It would match what was done for the SC8280XP
CRD.
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
Powered by blists - more mailing lists