[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260131091156.1733648-1-yi.zhang@huaweicloud.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 17:11:56 +0800
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...weicloud.com>
To: linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
tytso@....edu,
adilger.kernel@...ger.ca,
jack@...e.cz,
ojaswin@...ux.ibm.com,
ritesh.list@...il.com,
yi.zhang@...wei.com,
yi.zhang@...weicloud.com,
yizhang089@...il.com,
libaokun1@...wei.com,
yangerkun@...wei.com,
yukuai@...as.com
Subject: [PATCH v2] ext4: do not check fast symlink during orphan recovery
From: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
Commit '5f920d5d6083 ("ext4: verify fast symlink length")' causes the
generic/475 test to fail during orphan cleanup of zero-length symlinks.
generic/475 84s ... _check_generic_filesystem: filesystem on /dev/vde is inconsistent
The fsck reports are provided below:
Deleted inode 9686 has zero dtime.
Deleted inode 158230 has zero dtime.
...
Inode bitmap differences: -9686 -158230
Orphan file (inode 12) block 13 is not clean.
Failed to initialize orphan file.
In ext4_symlink(), a newly created symlink can be added to the orphan
list due to ENOSPC. Its data has not been initialized, and its size is
zero. Therefore, we need to disregard the length check of the symbolic
link when cleaning up orphan inodes. Instead, we should ensure that the
nlink count is zero.
Fixes: 5f920d5d6083 ("ext4: verify fast symlink length")
Signed-off-by: Zhang Yi <yi.zhang@...wei.com>
---
Changes since v1:
- Improve the comment and add nlink check during orphan cleanup as Jan
suggested.
fs/ext4/inode.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/ext4/inode.c b/fs/ext4/inode.c
index 129594bf8311..cfb66f7ad3d7 100644
--- a/fs/ext4/inode.c
+++ b/fs/ext4/inode.c
@@ -6073,18 +6073,36 @@ struct inode *__ext4_iget(struct super_block *sb, unsigned long ino,
inode->i_op = &ext4_encrypted_symlink_inode_operations;
} else if (ext4_inode_is_fast_symlink(inode)) {
inode->i_op = &ext4_fast_symlink_inode_operations;
- if (inode->i_size == 0 ||
- inode->i_size >= sizeof(ei->i_data) ||
- strnlen((char *)ei->i_data, inode->i_size + 1) !=
- inode->i_size) {
- ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
- "invalid fast symlink length %llu",
- (unsigned long long)inode->i_size);
- ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
- goto bad_inode;
+
+ /*
+ * Orphan cleanup can see inodes with i_size == 0
+ * and i_data uninitialized. Skip size checks in
+ * that case. This is safe because the first thing
+ * ext4_evict_inode() does for fast symlinks is
+ * clearing of i_data and i_size.
+ */
+ if ((EXT4_SB(sb)->s_mount_state & EXT4_ORPHAN_FS)) {
+ if (inode->i_nlink != 0) {
+ ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
+ "invalid orphan symlink nlink %d",
+ inode->i_nlink);
+ ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ goto bad_inode;
+ }
+ } else {
+ if (inode->i_size == 0 ||
+ inode->i_size >= sizeof(ei->i_data) ||
+ strnlen((char *)ei->i_data, inode->i_size + 1) !=
+ inode->i_size) {
+ ext4_error_inode(inode, function, line, 0,
+ "invalid fast symlink length %llu",
+ (unsigned long long)inode->i_size);
+ ret = -EFSCORRUPTED;
+ goto bad_inode;
+ }
+ inode_set_cached_link(inode, (char *)ei->i_data,
+ inode->i_size);
}
- inode_set_cached_link(inode, (char *)ei->i_data,
- inode->i_size);
} else {
inode->i_op = &ext4_symlink_inode_operations;
}
--
2.52.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists