linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 11/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and 'timeout' parameters

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a7d42750-276a-4348-802e-30cfa4ad3a81@tuxon.dev>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 18:00:55 +0200
From: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>
To: Alexander Dahl <ada@...rsis.com>
Cc: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com>,
 Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>,
 Ryan Wanner <ryan.wanner@...rochip.com>,
 linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
 stable@...r.kernel.org, Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@...nel.org>,
 Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 11/19] nvmem: microchip-otpc: Fix swapped 'sleep' and
 'timeout' parameters



On 1/20/26 17:44, Alexander Dahl wrote:
> Makes no sense to have a timeout shorter than the sleep time, it would
> run into timeout right after the first sleep already.
> While at it, use a more specific macro instead of the generic one, which
> does exactly the same, but needs less parameters.
> 
> Fixes: 98830350d3fc ("nvmem: microchip-otpc: add support")
> Cc:stable@...r.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Dahl<ada@...rsis.com>

Reviewed-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...on.dev>