[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260131164523.18a9ecb1@jic23-huawei>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 16:45:23 +0000
From: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
To: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay
<devnull+jean-baptiste.maneyrol.tdk.com@...nel.org>
Cc: jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com, David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>, Andy Shevchenko
<andy@...nel.org>, Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jmaneyrol@...ensense.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@...wei.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: imu: inv_icm42600: fix odr switch to the same
value
On Fri, 30 Jan 2026 16:38:47 +0100
Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol via B4 Relay <devnull+jean-baptiste.maneyrol.tdk.com@...nel.org> wrote:
> From: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>
>
> ODR switch is done in 2 steps when FIFO is on : change the ODR register
> value and acknowledge change when reading the FIFO ODR change flag.
> When we are switching to the same odr value, we end up waiting for a
> FIFO ODR flag that is never happening.
>
> Fix the issue by doing nothing and exiting properly when we are
> switching to the same ODR value.
>
> Fixes: ec74ae9fd37c ("iio: imu: inv_icm42600: add accurate timestamping")
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Baptiste Maneyrol <jean-baptiste.maneyrol@....com>
> Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Given we are very close to the merge window and I have the main pull request
set up already, I'm going to apply this to a local fixes branch that I'll
rebase and push out in a few weeks time.
So there should be nothing else to do here, but you won't see it in linux-next
for a little while. Maybe if I get a bunch of fixes I'll do a second pull
request to Greg to line up for the merge window.
thanks,
Jonathan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists