[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <be3ac5d5-55c9-40e2-af5c-75fd716dbea7@igalia.com>
Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2026 10:40:27 +0900
From: Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>, Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@...ux.dev>, Eduard Zingerman
<eddyz87@...il.com>, Song Liu <song@...nel.org>,
Yonghong Song <yonghong.song@...ux.dev>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>, KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>,
Stanislav Fomichev <sdf@...ichev.me>, Hao Luo <haoluo@...gle.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
kernel-dev@...lia.com, bpf <bpf@...r.kernel.org>, sched-ext@...ts.linux.dev,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:KERNEL SELFTEST FRAMEWORK" <linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] selftests/bpf: Make x86 preempt_count access
compatible across v6.14+
Hi Alexei,
On 1/31/26 5:23 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2026 at 6:19 PM Changwoo Min <changwoo@...lia.com> wrote:
>
> Please use proper kernel comment style in the future.
> We don't use old networking style in bpf anymore.
> I fixed it up while applying.
>
> Also use [PATCH bpf-next] in the subject to help CI identify the tree.
Noted. Thanks a lot!
Regards,
Changwoo Min
Powered by blists - more mailing lists