[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260201083132.sfxg7y63duukoxte@skbuf>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 10:31:32 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Daniel Golle <daniel@...rotopia.org>
Cc: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@...ke-m.de>, Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 0/3] net: dsa: mxl-gsw1xx: setup polarities
and validate chip
On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 03:41:34AM +0000, Daniel Golle wrote:
> Now that common PHY properties make it easy to configure the SerDes RX
> and TX polarities, use that for the SGMII/1000Base-X/2500Base-X port of
> the MaxLinear GSW1xx switches.
>
> Also, validate hardware in probe() function to make sure the switch is
> actually present and MDIO communication works properly.
> ---
> Changes since v2:
> * be more clear about describing polarity at port, ie. external pin level
>
> Changes since initial submission:
> * use allOf to include phy-common-props in dt-schema
> * use phy_get_manual_rx_polarity and phy_get_manual_tx_polarity helpers
> instead of open-coding them
For the set:
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists