[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260201.616f24966d36@gnoack.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 13:24:14 +0100
From: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
To: Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@...cle.com>
Cc: gnoack@...gle.com, mic@...ikod.net,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] landlock: add backwards compatibility for
restrict flags
On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 07:18:10PM -0800, Samasth Norway Ananda wrote:
> Add backwards compatibility handling for the restrict flags introduced
> in ABI version 7. This is shown as a separate code block (similar to
> the ruleset_attr handling in the switch statement) because restrict flags
> are passed to landlock_restrict_self() rather than being part of the
> ruleset attributes.
>
> Also fix misleading description of the /usr rule which incorrectly
> stated it "only allow[s] reading" when the code actually allows both
> reading and executing (LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_EXECUTE is included in
> allowed_access).
>
> Signed-off-by: Samasth Norway Ananda <samasth.norway.ananda@...cle.com>
> ---
> Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst | 30 +++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> index 1ed25af0499f..c8ef1392a0c7 100644
> --- a/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/userspace-api/landlock.rst
> @@ -157,11 +157,11 @@ This enables the creation of an inclusive ruleset that will contain our rules.
> }
>
> We can now add a new rule to this ruleset thanks to the returned file
> -descriptor referring to this ruleset. The rule will only allow reading the
> -file hierarchy ``/usr``. Without another rule, write actions would then be
> -denied by the ruleset. To add ``/usr`` to the ruleset, we open it with the
> -``O_PATH`` flag and fill the &struct landlock_path_beneath_attr with this file
> -descriptor.
> +descriptor referring to this ruleset. The rule will allow reading and
> +executing the file hierarchy ``/usr``. Without another rule, write actions
> +would then be denied by the ruleset. To add ``/usr`` to the ruleset, we open
> +it with the ``O_PATH`` flag and fill the &struct landlock_path_beneath_attr with
> +this file descriptor.
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> @@ -233,10 +233,24 @@ to effectively block sending UDP datagrams to arbitrary ports.
> err = landlock_add_rule(ruleset_fd, LANDLOCK_RULE_NET_PORT,
> &net_port, 0);
>
> +When passing a non-zero ``flags`` argument to ``landlock_restrict_self()``, a
> +similar backwards compatibility check is needed for the restrict flags
> +(see sys_landlock_restrict_self() documentation for available flags):
> +
> +.. code-block:: c
> +
> + __u32 restrict_flags = LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON;
> + if (abi < 7) {
> + /* Clear logging flags unsupported before ABI 7. */
> + restrict_flags &= ~(LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SAME_EXEC_OFF |
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_NEW_EXEC_ON |
> + LANDLOCK_RESTRICT_SELF_LOG_SUBDOMAINS_OFF);
> + }
> +
> The next step is to restrict the current thread from gaining more privileges
> (e.g. through a SUID binary). We now have a ruleset with the first rule
> -allowing read access to ``/usr`` while denying all other handled accesses for
> -the filesystem, and two more rules allowing DNS queries.
> +allowing read and execute access to ``/usr`` while denying all other handled
> +accesses for the filesystem, and two more rules allowing DNS queries.
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> @@ -250,7 +264,7 @@ The current thread is now ready to sandbox itself with the ruleset.
>
> .. code-block:: c
>
> - if (landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, 0)) {
> + if (landlock_restrict_self(ruleset_fd, restrict_flags)) {
> perror("Failed to enforce ruleset");
> close(ruleset_fd);
> return 1;
> --
> 2.50.1
>
Reviewed-by: Günther Noack <gnoack3000@...il.com>
Thanks!
–Günther
Powered by blists - more mailing lists