[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260201-ancient-glistening-clam-31be7e@lemur>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2026 10:10:03 -0500
From: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Vivian Wang <wangruikang@...as.ac.cn>
Cc: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Yixun Lan <dlan@...too.org>,
Paul Walmsley <pjw@...nel.org>, Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, spacemit@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Han Gao <rabenda.cn@...il.com>, Han Gao <gaohan@...as.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/7] riscv: dts: spacemit: Add PMIC regulators usb pcie
On Sun, Feb 01, 2026 at 03:54:45PM +0800, Vivian Wang wrote:
> > This review was done by Claude Opus 4.5. I do not know enough about the
> > subsystem to make any judgment about the quality of these reviews, but
> > they look valid enough.
>
> I'm not sure if you see this, but your bot gave two contradictory
> recommendations.
Criticism accepted. For the record, it's not a bot -- I'm writing a review
tool that *may*, should the reviewer wish it, incorporate an LLM agent as a
manual step.
My goal was to test end-to-end review functionality, but from now on I will
focus on subsystems where I can actually discern actual useful reviews from
"looks reasonable" reviews.
Thanks and my apologies,
-K
Powered by blists - more mailing lists