[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20260203123042.3745628-1-zilin@seu.edu.cn>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:30:42 +0000
From: Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn>
To: andy.shevchenko@...il.com
Cc: andy@...nel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
hansg@...nel.org,
hverkuil@...nel.org,
jianhao.xu@....edu.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
mchehab@...nel.org,
sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com,
zilin@....edu.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: atomisp: Fix memory leak in atomisp_fixed_pattern_table()
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 10:12:34AM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 1, 2026 at 3:59 PM Zilin Guan <zilin@....edu.cn> wrote:
> >
> > atomisp_v4l2_framebuffer_to_css_frame() allocates memory for
> > temporary variable raw_black_frame, which must be released via
> > ia_css_frame_free() before the function returns. However, if
> > sh_css_set_black_frame() fails, the function returns immediately without
> > performing this cleanup, leading to a memory leak.
> >
> > Fix this by assigning the error code to ret and allowing the code to
> > fall through to the ia_css_frame_free() call.
> >
> > The bug was originally detected on v6.13-rc1 using an experimental
> > static analysis tool we are developing, and we have verified that the
> > issue persists in the latest mainline kernel. The tool is based on the
> > LLVM framework and is specifically designed to detect memory management
> > issues. It is currently under active development and not yet publicly
> > available.
> >
> > We performed build testing on x86_64 with allyesconfig. Since triggering
> > this error path in atomisp requires specific Intel Atom ISP hardware and
> > firmware, we were unable to perform runtime testing and instead verified
> > the fix according to the code logic.
>
> ...
>
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/media/atomisp/pci/atomisp_cmd.c
> > @@ -3369,7 +3369,7 @@ int atomisp_fixed_pattern_table(struct atomisp_sub_device *asd,
> >
> > if (sh_css_set_black_frame(asd->stream_env[ATOMISP_INPUT_STREAM_GENERAL].stream,
> > raw_black_frame) != 0)
> > - return -ENOMEM;
> > + ret = -ENOMEM;
> >
> > ia_css_frame_free(raw_black_frame);
> > return ret;
>
>
> No, instead assign the returned code to ret to begin with
>
> ret = sh_css_set_black_frame(...);
> ia_css_frame_free(raw_black_frame);
> return ret;
>
> --
> With Best Regards,
> Andy Shevchenko
Hi Andy,
Thanks for the suggestion. Assigning the return value directly to ret is
indeed cleaner.
I will update the code as suggested and send v3.
Best regards,
Zilin Guan
Powered by blists - more mailing lists