linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] bfq: protect q->blkg_list iteration in bfq_end_wr_async() with blkcg

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <202602032109.oYgANNeZ-lkp@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:36:52 +0800
From: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
To: Yu Kuai <yukuai@...as.com>, tj@...nel.org, josef@...icpanda.com,
	axboe@...nel.dk
Cc: llvm@...ts.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@...ts.linux.dev,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-block@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, yukuai@...as.com,
	zhengqixing@...wei.com, mkoutny@...e.com, hch@...radead.org,
	ming.lei@...hat.com, nilay@...ux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/7] bfq: protect q->blkg_list iteration in
 bfq_end_wr_async() with blkcg_mutex

Hi Yu,

kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:

[auto build test ERROR on axboe/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.19-rc8 next-20260202]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yu-Kuai/blk-cgroup-protect-q-blkg_list-iteration-in-blkg_destroy_all-with-blkcg_mutex/20260203-161356
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux.git for-next
patch link:    https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260203080602.726505-3-yukuai%40fnnas.com
patch subject: [PATCH v2 2/7] bfq: protect q->blkg_list iteration in bfq_end_wr_async() with blkcg_mutex
config: s390-randconfig-002-20260203 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260203/202602032109.oYgANNeZ-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 22.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 9b8addffa70cee5b2acc5454712d9cf78ce45710)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260203/202602032109.oYgANNeZ-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202602032109.oYgANNeZ-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> block/bfq-iosched.c:2648:27: error: no member named 'blkcg_mutex' in 'struct request_queue'
    2648 |         mutex_lock(&bfqd->queue->blkcg_mutex);
         |                     ~~~~~~~~~~~  ^
   include/linux/mutex.h:193:44: note: expanded from macro 'mutex_lock'
     193 | #define mutex_lock(lock) mutex_lock_nested(lock, 0)
         |                                            ^~~~
   block/bfq-iosched.c:2660:29: error: no member named 'blkcg_mutex' in 'struct request_queue'
    2660 |         mutex_unlock(&bfqd->queue->blkcg_mutex);
         |                       ~~~~~~~~~~~  ^
   2 errors generated.


vim +2648 block/bfq-iosched.c

  2642	
  2643	static void bfq_end_wr(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
  2644	{
  2645		struct bfq_queue *bfqq;
  2646		int i;
  2647	
> 2648		mutex_lock(&bfqd->queue->blkcg_mutex);
  2649		spin_lock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
  2650	
  2651		for (i = 0; i < bfqd->num_actuators; i++) {
  2652			list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->active_list[i], bfqq_list)
  2653				bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq);
  2654		}
  2655		list_for_each_entry(bfqq, &bfqd->idle_list, bfqq_list)
  2656			bfq_bfqq_end_wr(bfqq);
  2657		bfq_end_wr_async(bfqd);
  2658	
  2659		spin_unlock_irq(&bfqd->lock);
  2660		mutex_unlock(&bfqd->queue->blkcg_mutex);
  2661	}
  2662	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki