lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <871pj14xnr.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 17:08:56 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri-calderon@...ux.intel.com>, Tony Luck
 <tony.luck@...el.com>, Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>, "Rafael J.
 Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>, Reinette Chatre
 <reinette.chatre@...el.com>, Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
 Ricardo Neri <ricardo.neri@...el.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 Alexander Graf <graf@...zon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 18/24] init/main: Delay initialization of the lockup
 detector after smp_init()

On Wed, Mar 01 2023 at 15:47, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> Certain implementations of the hardlockup detector require support for
> Inter-Processor Interrupt shorthands. On x86, support for these can only
> be determined after all the possible CPUs have booted once (in smp_init()).
> Other architectures may not need such check.

Looking at this with a completely rebooted brain, I think this is not
required at all when the HPET watchdog mechanics to propagate the
watchdog NMI are done differently. I'll comment on that in the related
patch.

Thanks,

        tglx

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ