[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87tsvx3fxq.ffs@tglx>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 18:17:05 +0100
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn>, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
kernel@...0n.name, corbet@....net, alexs@...nel.org, si.yanteng@...ux.dev,
jiaxun.yang@...goat.com, maobibo@...ngson.cn
Cc: loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Tianyang Zhang <zhangtianyang@...ngson.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 2/4] irqchip/irq-loonarch-avec: Prepare for
interrupt redirection support
On Tue, Feb 03 2026 at 20:45, Tianyang Zhang wrote:
$Subject: irqchip/irq-loonarch-avec
I know you blindly copied my suggestion and obviously you failed to spot
the missing 'g'.
> Interrupt redirection support requires a new interrupt chip, which
> needs to share data structures, constants and functions with the AVEC
> code.
>
> Move them to the header file and make the required functions public.
But then you still keep this nonsense around, which has no place in the
change log as I explained to you before:
"Enumerating the details of what is moved is a pointless exercise
because that can bee seen from the diff itself."
What's so hard about that to understand?
Just in case I'm not able to express myself coherently, this means:
Remove the following 4 lines:
> including:
> 1 marco AVEC_MSG_OFFSET
> 2 struct avecintc_data
> 3 Make avecintc_sync public
Sigh. Though I have to admit that 'loonarch' gave me a good laugh at
least.
Thanks,
tglx
Powered by blists - more mailing lists