[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYI2grbaboVrhXoj@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 17:55:14 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] mm/kmemleak: Remove unreachable return statement in
scan_should_stop()
On Fri, Jan 30, 2026 at 05:37:28PM +0800, Zhongqiu Han wrote:
> Remove unreachable "return 0;" statement as all execution paths return
> before reaching it.
>
> No functional change.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhongqiu Han <zhongqiu.han@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> mm/kmemleak.c | 4 +---
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/kmemleak.c b/mm/kmemleak.c
> index fe33f2edfe07..fb0022f34393 100644
> --- a/mm/kmemleak.c
> +++ b/mm/kmemleak.c
> @@ -1509,10 +1509,8 @@ static int scan_should_stop(void)
> */
> if (current->mm)
> return signal_pending(current);
> - else
> - return kthread_should_stop();
>
> - return 0;
> + return kthread_should_stop();
> }
Yeah, not sure how I ended up with this.
Acked-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists