lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260203181321.GX2328995@ziepe.ca>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 14:13:21 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@....com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
	Ackerley Tng <ackerleytng@...gle.com>, cgroups@...r.kernel.org,
	kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-trace-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, binbin.wu@...ux.intel.com, bp@...en8.de,
	brauner@...nel.org, chao.p.peng@...el.com, chenhuacai@...nel.org,
	corbet@....net, dave.hansen@...el.com, dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com,
	david@...hat.com, dmatlack@...gle.com, erdemaktas@...gle.com,
	fan.du@...el.com, fvdl@...gle.com, haibo1.xu@...el.com,
	hannes@...xchg.org, hch@...radead.org, hpa@...or.com,
	hughd@...gle.com, ira.weiny@...el.com, isaku.yamahata@...el.com,
	jack@...e.cz, james.morse@....com, jarkko@...nel.org,
	jgowans@...zon.com, jhubbard@...dia.com, jroedel@...e.de,
	jthoughton@...gle.com, jun.miao@...el.com, kai.huang@...el.com,
	keirf@...gle.com, kent.overstreet@...ux.dev,
	liam.merwick@...cle.com, maciej.wieczor-retman@...el.com,
	mail@...iej.szmigiero.name, maobibo@...ngson.cn,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, maz@...nel.org, mhiramat@...nel.org,
	mhocko@...nel.org, mic@...ikod.net, michael.roth@....com,
	mingo@...hat.com, mlevitsk@...hat.com, mpe@...erman.id.au,
	muchun.song@...ux.dev, nikunj@....com, nsaenz@...zon.es,
	oliver.upton@...ux.dev, palmer@...belt.com, pankaj.gupta@....com,
	paul.walmsley@...ive.com, pbonzini@...hat.com, peterx@...hat.com,
	pgonda@...gle.com, prsampat@....com, pvorel@...e.cz,
	qperret@...gle.com, richard.weiyang@...il.com,
	rick.p.edgecombe@...el.com, rientjes@...gle.com,
	rostedt@...dmis.org, roypat@...zon.co.uk, rppt@...nel.org,
	shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, shuah@...nel.org, steven.price@....com,
	steven.sistare@...cle.com, suzuki.poulose@....com, tabba@...gle.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, thomas.lendacky@....com, vannapurve@...gle.com,
	vbabka@...e.cz, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, vkuznets@...hat.com,
	wei.w.wang@...el.com, will@...nel.org, willy@...radead.org,
	wyihan@...gle.com, xiaoyao.li@...el.com, yan.y.zhao@...el.com,
	yilun.xu@...el.com, yuzenghui@...wei.com, zhiquan1.li@...el.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 05/37] KVM: guest_memfd: Wire up
 kvm_get_memory_attributes() to per-gmem attributes

On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 12:07:46PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 29/1/26 12:16, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 05:03:27PM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> > 
> > > For a dmabuf fd, the story is the same as guest_memfd.  Unless private vs. shared
> > > is all or nothing, and can never change, then the only entity that can track that
> > > info is the owner of the dmabuf.  And even if the private vs. shared attributes
> > > are constant, tracking it external to KVM makes sense, because then the provider
> > > can simply hardcode %true/%false.
> > 
> > Oh my I had not given that bit any thought. My remarks were just about
> > normal non-CC systems.
> > 
> > So MMIO starts out shared, and then converts to private when the guest
> > triggers it. It is not all or nothing, there are permanent shared
> > holes in the MMIO ranges too.
> > 
> > Beyond that I don't know what people are thinking.
> > 
> > Clearly VFIO has to revoke and disable the DMABUF once any of it
> > becomes private.
> 
> huh? Private MMIO still has to be mapped in the NPT (well, on
> AMD). It is the userspace mapping which we do not want^wneed and we
> do not by using dmabuf.

Well, we don't know what the DMABUF got imported into, so the non-KVM
importers using the shared mapping certainly have to drop it.

How exactly to make that happen is going to be interesting..

Jason

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ