[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6235268.lOV4Wx5bFT@natalenko.name>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2026 22:39:41 +0100
From: Oleksandr Natalenko <oleksandr@...alenko.name>
To: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>
Cc: Gergo Koteles <soyer@....hu>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>,
Jarkko Sakkinen <jarkko@...nel.org>, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com, anisse@...ier.eu,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@...nel.org>,
Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com>,
Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>,
open list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Nicolas Dufresne <nicolas@...fresne.ca>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] media: Virtual camera driver
On úterý 3. února 2026 21:36:48, středoevropský standardní čas Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 04:53:41PM +0200, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 03:38:06PM +0100, Oleksandr Natalenko wrote:
> > >
> > > Just to share my current state of affairs:
> > >
> > > * sender:
> > >
> > > $ gst-launch-1.0 pipewiresrc path=<webcam_id> ! video/x-h264, width=1280, height=720, framerate=24/1 ! rtph264pay ! rtpstreampay ! udpsink host=<receiver_host> port=<receiver_port>
> > >
> > > * receiver:
> > >
> > > $ gst-launch-1.0 udpsrc address=<receiver_host> port=<receiver_port> ! queue ! application/x-rtp-stream,encoding-name=H264 ! rtpstreamdepay ! application/x-rtp,encoding-name=H264 ! rtph264depay ! h264parse ! openh264dec ! pipewiresink mode=provide stream-properties="properties,media.class=Video/Source,media.role=Camera" client-name=VirtualCam
> > >
> > > I chose H.264 because of much lower (tenfold) traffic comparing to
> > > MJPEG, wrapped this into RTP, opted in for OpenH264 decoder because I
> > > read it was handling low latency streams better than avdec_h264, and
> > > tested this setup with both Firefox and Chromium, and it actually
> > > worked pretty reliably, so I'm impressed now.
> >
> > Thank you for the update. I'll give this a try.
>
> I've tried those, but as soon as Firefox is connecting, I get
>
> 0:00:03.569028999 131465 0x7f85cc002030 DEBUG pipewiresink gstpipewiresink.c:692:on_state_changed:<pipewiresink0> got stream state "error" (-1)
> 0:00:03.569060959 131465 0x7f85cc002030 DEBUG pipewiresink gstpipewiresink.c:692:on_state_changed:<pipewiresink0> got stream state "error" (-1)
> 0:00:03.569070767 131465 0x7f85cc002030 WARN pipewiresink gstpipewiresink.c:710:on_state_changed:<pipewiresink0> error: stream error: no more input formats
> ERROR: from element /GstPipeline:pipeline0/GstPipeWireSink:pipewiresink0: stream error: no more input formats
> Additional debug info:
> ../pipewire-1.4.9/src/gst/gstpipewiresink.c(710): on_state_changed (): /GstPipeline:pipeline0/GstPipeWireSink:pipewiresink0
>
> Maybe I should try the pipewire master branch.
I'd be glad to help, but my understanding of this "stream error: no more input formats" boils down only to the absence of caps identifiers (like those "application/x-rtp-stream"blahblah), which is not the case here. Also, Firefox behaves differently from Chrome when using sites like webcamtests, and also when using google meet. I may speculate Firefox more eagerly closes link to a pipewire node, but I have no knowledge of this at all.
That said, "pretty reliably" doesn't mean without issues whatsoever, and I manage to crash both Chrome and Firefox from time to time while experimenting with pipelines. Probably because I occasionally unintentionally feed some crap into the pipewire sink.
FWIW, I'm using 1:1.4.10-2 pipewire packages from Arch.
--
Oleksandr Natalenko, MSE
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists