[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260203214342.584712-33-ben.horgan@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 21:43:33 +0000
From: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
To: ben.horgan@....com
Cc: amitsinght@...vell.com,
baisheng.gao@...soc.com,
baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
carl@...amperecomputing.com,
dave.martin@....com,
david@...nel.org,
dfustini@...libre.com,
fenghuay@...dia.com,
gshan@...hat.com,
james.morse@....com,
jonathan.cameron@...wei.com,
kobak@...dia.com,
lcherian@...vell.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
peternewman@...gle.com,
punit.agrawal@....qualcomm.com,
quic_jiles@...cinc.com,
reinette.chatre@...el.com,
rohit.mathew@....com,
scott@...amperecomputing.com,
sdonthineni@...dia.com,
tan.shaopeng@...itsu.com,
xhao@...ux.alibaba.com,
catalin.marinas@....com,
will@...nel.org,
corbet@....net,
maz@...nel.org,
oupton@...nel.org,
joey.gouly@....com,
suzuki.poulose@....com,
kvmarm@...ts.linux.dev,
zengheng4@...wei.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [PATCH v4 32/41] arm_mpam: resctrl: Update the rmid reallocation limit
From: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
resctrl's limbo code needs to be told when the data left in a cache is
small enough for the partid+pmg value to be re-allocated.
x86 uses the cache size divided by the number of rmid users the cache may
have. Do the same, but for the smallest cache, and with the number of
partid-and-pmg users.
Tested-by: Gavin Shan <gshan@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Shaopeng Tan <tan.shaopeng@...fujitsu.com>
Tested-by: Peter Newman <peternewman@...gle.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <jonathan.cameron@...wei.com>
Signed-off-by: James Morse <james.morse@....com>
Signed-off-by: Ben Horgan <ben.horgan@....com>
---
Changes since v2:
Move waiting for cache info into it's own patch
Changes since v3:
Move check class is csu higher (just kept to document intent)
continue -> break
to squash update rmid limits
use raw_smp_processor_id()
---
drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 39 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
index e8102cc74de8..e2b1afca5f01 100644
--- a/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
+++ b/drivers/resctrl/mpam_resctrl.c
@@ -486,6 +486,42 @@ void resctrl_arch_reset_rmid(struct rdt_resource *r, struct rdt_l3_mon_domain *d
reset_mon_cdp_safe(mon, mon_comp, USE_PRE_ALLOCATED, closid, rmid);
}
+/*
+ * The rmid realloc threshold should be for the smallest cache exposed to
+ * resctrl.
+ */
+static int update_rmid_limits(struct mpam_class *class)
+{
+ u32 num_unique_pmg = resctrl_arch_system_num_rmid_idx();
+ struct mpam_props *cprops = &class->props;
+ struct cacheinfo *ci;
+
+ lockdep_assert_cpus_held();
+
+ if (!mpam_has_feature(mpam_feat_msmon_csu, cprops))
+ return 0;
+
+ /*
+ * Assume cache levels are the same size for all CPUs...
+ * The check just requires any online CPU and it can't go offline as we
+ * hold the cpu lock.
+ */
+ ci = get_cpu_cacheinfo_level(raw_smp_processor_id(), class->level);
+ if (!ci || ci->size == 0) {
+ pr_debug("Could not read cache size for class %u\n",
+ class->level);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ if (!resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit ||
+ ci->size < resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit) {
+ resctrl_rmid_realloc_limit = ci->size;
+ resctrl_rmid_realloc_threshold = ci->size / num_unique_pmg;
+ }
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static bool cache_has_usable_cpor(struct mpam_class *class)
{
struct mpam_props *cprops = &class->props;
@@ -991,6 +1027,9 @@ static void mpam_resctrl_pick_counters(void)
/* CSU counters only make sense on a cache. */
switch (class->type) {
case MPAM_CLASS_CACHE:
+ if (update_rmid_limits(class))
+ break;
+
counter_update_class(QOS_L3_OCCUP_EVENT_ID, class);
break;
default:
--
2.43.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists