linux-kernel - Re: [rfc 0/2] pinctrl property checks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD++jLnz1r1gnE3B_0MCr0JrfEdT-74nM7wL3ErdrmzHOrnovQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 00:30:30 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>
To: Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org>
Cc: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@...rochip.com>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, 
	Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>, Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org, 
	devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [rfc 0/2] pinctrl property checks

On Tue, Feb 3, 2026 at 6:30 PM Conor Dooley <conor@...nel.org> wrote:

> Finally got around to sending the property stuff that we were talking
> about. It's definitely not the best thing I have ever written, but I
> think it does an okay job of warning about setups that don't make sense
> while adding fairly little complexity wise.

I like what I see and I think we should apply it for the v7.1 kernel cycle
post v7.0-rc1.

Are you ready to send a non-RFC version by then?

Yours,
Linus Walleij