lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <fwutwpejyptpo6gqv75zanqciv3fmxvillomwcjvtz4auebbc2@vazub2ct7pa2>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:47:46 +0800
From: Vernon Yang <vernon2gm@...il.com>
To: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Cc: 李龙兴 <coregee2000@...il.com>, 
	syzkaller@...glegroups.com, vbabka@...e.cz, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, cl@...two.org, 
	rientjes@...gle.com, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev, linux-mm@...ck.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Kernel Bug] WARNING in mempool_alloc_noprof

On 2026-02-02, Harry Yoo wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2026 at 02:40:14PM +0800, 李龙兴 wrote:
> > Dear Linux kernel developers and maintainers,
> >
> > We would like to report a new kernel bug found by our tool. WARNING in
> > mempool_alloc_noprof. Details are as follows.
> >
> > Kernel commit: v6.12.11
> > Kernel config: see attachment
> > report: see attachment
> >
> > We are currently analyzing the root cause and  working on a
> > reproducible PoC. We will provide further updates in this thread as
> > soon as we have more information.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Longxing Li
> >
> > ------------[ cut here ]------------
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 362734 at mm/page_alloc.c:4234
> > __alloc_pages_slowpath mm/page_alloc.c:4234 [inline]
> > WARNING: CPU: 1 PID: 362734 at mm/page_alloc.c:4234
> > __alloc_pages_noprof+0x2025/0x25a0 mm/page_alloc.c:4766
> > Modules linked in:
> > CPU: 1 UID: 0 PID: 362734 Comm: syz-executor.5 Not tainted 6.12.11 #1
> > Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1 04/01/2014
> > RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_slowpath mm/page_alloc.c:4234 [inline]
> > RIP: 0010:__alloc_pages_noprof+0x2025/0x25a0 mm/page_alloc.c:4766
>
> page allocator triggers a warning when __GFP_NOFAIL is set but
> __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not set.
>
> > Code: 10 00 00 00 44 8b 74 24 48 41 89 c5 0f b6 c0 44 8b a4 24 84 00
> > 00 00 89 44 24 28 e9 e5 f6 ff ff 90 0f 0b 90 e9 f1 f6 ff ff 90 <0f> 0b
> > 90 e9 1e fb ff ff e8 2e a4 38 09 e9 5e ed ff ff 4c 89 f7 e8
> > RSP: 0000:ffffc9003ce9e7d0 EFLAGS: 00010246
> > RAX: 0000000000008000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: ffffc9003ce9e8fc
> > RDX: 0000000000000000 RSI: 0000000000000002 RDI: ffff88813fff99c8
> > RBP: 0000000000000000 R08: 000000000000028d R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: ffff88807fffbc17 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 000000000009a800
> > R13: 000000000009a800 R14: 1ffff920079d3d0e R15: 0000000000000001
> > FS:  00007f1784eff640(0000) GS:ffff888135e00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
> > CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
> > CR2: 000055bb25a85a28 CR3: 0000000096938000 CR4: 0000000000752ef0
> > PKRU: 55555554
> > Call Trace:
> >  <TASK>
> >  alloc_pages_mpol_noprof+0x2c9/0x610 mm/mempolicy.c:2269
> >  mempool_alloc_noprof+0x176/0x390 mm/mempool.c:402
>
> the user of the mempool (f2fs_encrypt_one_page) passed __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM,
> but mempool temporarily cleared it, but not __GFP_NOFAIL:
>    gfp_temp = gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM|__GFP_IO)
>
> Hmm perhaps mempool should clear __GFP_NOFAIL as well when clearing
> __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM?

LGTM. I wrote a fix pacth, as below.

---

>From 9131e1b26b1ec55dd38ab08512ed6da0fa7a21f0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@...inos.cn>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 10:51:45 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] mm: mempool: remove __GFP_NOFAIL gfp_mask when first
 allocation

page allocator triggers a warning when __GFP_NOFAIL is set but
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM is not set.

The user of the mempool (f2fs_encrypt_one_page) passed
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM, but mempool temporarily cleared it when
first allocate memory.

    gfp_temp = gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM|__GFP_IO)

Make mempool also clear __GFP_NOFAIL as well when clearing
__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM.

Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/CAHPqNmwK9TY5THsXWkJuYCdt7x+mZHPq65AUOLZJeMp-FdAMvA@mail.gmail.com
Suggested-by: Harry Yoo <harry.yoo@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Vernon Yang <yanglincheng@...inos.cn>
---
 mm/mempool.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/mm/mempool.c b/mm/mempool.c
index c290e5261b47..679ab4a2cc5f 100644
--- a/mm/mempool.c
+++ b/mm/mempool.c
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@ static unsigned int mempool_alloc_from_pool(struct mempool *pool, void **elems,
 static inline gfp_t mempool_adjust_gfp(gfp_t *gfp_mask)
 {
 	*gfp_mask |= __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOWARN;
-	return *gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO);
+	return *gfp_mask & ~(__GFP_NOFAIL | __GFP_DIRECT_RECLAIM | __GFP_IO);
 }

 /**
--
2.51.0

>
> >  fscrypt_alloc_bounce_page+0x28/0x60 fs/crypto/crypto.c:59
> >  fscrypt_encrypt_pagecache_blocks.cold+0x567/0x6da fs/crypto/crypto.c:202
> >  f2fs_encrypt_one_page+0x187/0x630 fs/f2fs/data.c:2516
> >  f2fs_do_write_data_page+0x7b4/0x1900 fs/f2fs/data.c:2706
> >  f2fs_write_single_data_page+0x1454/0x1c30 fs/f2fs/data.c:2872
> >  f2fs_write_cache_pages+0xd6e/0x24e0 fs/f2fs/data.c:3166
> >  __f2fs_write_data_pages fs/f2fs/data.c:3321 [inline]
> >  f2fs_write_data_pages+0x4af/0xdd0 fs/f2fs/data.c:3348
> >  do_writepages+0x1a3/0x7f0 mm/page-writeback.c:2683
> >  filemap_fdatawrite_wbc mm/filemap.c:398 [inline]
> >  filemap_fdatawrite_wbc+0x148/0x1c0 mm/filemap.c:388
> >  __filemap_fdatawrite_range+0xb3/0xf0 mm/filemap.c:431
> >  file_write_and_wait_range+0xca/0x140 mm/filemap.c:788
> >  f2fs_do_sync_file+0x2dc/0x1ed0 fs/f2fs/file.c:278
> >  f2fs_sync_file+0x13a/0x1a0 fs/f2fs/file.c:395
> >  vfs_fsync_range+0x136/0x220 fs/sync.c:188
> >  generic_write_sync include/linux/fs.h:2871 [inline]
> >  f2fs_file_write_iter+0x12ba/0x2370 fs/f2fs/file.c:5057
> >  new_sync_write fs/read_write.c:590 [inline]
> >  vfs_write+0x5ae/0x1150 fs/read_write.c:683
> >  ksys_write+0x12f/0x260 fs/read_write.c:736
> >  do_syscall_x64 arch/x86/entry/common.c:52 [inline]
> >  do_syscall_64+0xcd/0x250 arch/x86/entry/common.c:83
> >  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x77/0x7f
> > RIP: 0033:0x471ecd
> > Code: c3 e8 17 28 00 00 0f 1f 80 00 00 00 00 f3 0f 1e fa 48 89 f8 48
> > 89 f7 48 89 d6 48 89 ca 4d 89 c2 4d 89 c8 4c 8b 4c 24 08 0f 05 <48> 3d
> > 01 f0 ff ff 73 01 c3 48 c7 c1 b0 ff ff ff f7 d8 64 89 01 48
> > RSP: 002b:00007f1784eff058 EFLAGS: 00000246 ORIG_RAX: 0000000000000001
> > RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 000000000059bf80 RCX: 0000000000471ecd
> > RDX: 0000000000000002 RSI: 00000000200003c0 RDI: 0000000000000004
> > RBP: 0000000000000002 R08: 0000000000000000 R09: 0000000000000000
> > R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000246 R12: 000000000059bf8c
> > R13: 000000000000000b R14: 000000000059bf80 R15: 00007f1784edf000
> >  </TASK>
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/17HbDTI_iPjA72SkV5MnO-_w7IQZ9HIHW/view?usp=drive_link
> >
> > https://drive.google.com/file/d/19pMiWedcVz8nFrj9jiJXuCjyPbNjYQqq/view?usp=drive_link
>

--
Thanks,
Vernon

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ