[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260203061059.975605-6-tzungbi@kernel.org>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 06:10:52 +0000
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>,
Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
tzungbi@...nel.org,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 05/11] gpio: cdev: Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open()
It's harmless even if: chrdev_open() and cdev_device_del() run at the
same time, and gpio_chrdev_open() gets called after the underlying GPIO
chip has gone. The subsequent file operations check the availability
of struct gpio_chip anyway.
Don't check struct gpio_chip in gpio_chrdev_open().
Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
---
v2:
- No changes.
v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260116081036.352286-11-tzungbi@kernel.org
drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c | 6 ------
1 file changed, 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
index b89201578516..aaa5de814468 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib-cdev.c
@@ -2689,12 +2689,6 @@ static int gpio_chrdev_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *file)
struct gpio_chardev_data *cdev;
int ret = -ENOMEM;
- guard(srcu)(&gdev->srcu);
-
- /* Fail on open if the backing gpiochip is gone */
- if (!rcu_access_pointer(gdev->chip))
- return -ENODEV;
-
cdev = kzalloc(sizeof(*cdev), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!cdev)
return -ENOMEM;
--
2.53.0.rc2.204.g2597b5adb4-goog
Powered by blists - more mailing lists