[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYHH69gXyuwmQR03@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 12:03:23 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] iio: dac: ds4424: use device match data for
chip info
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 10:34:26AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> Refactor the driver to use device match data instead of checking ID enums
> in a switch statement.
>
> Define a `ds4424_chip_info` structure to hold variant-specific attributes
> (currently just the channel count) and attach it directly to the I2C and
> OF device ID tables.
>
> Use `client->name` instead of `id->name` to decouple the probe function
> from the legacy `i2c_device_id` structure.
>
> This simplifies the probe function and makes it easier to add support for
> new variants like DS4402/DS4404.
...
> - indio_dev->name = id->name;
> + indio_dev->name = client->name;
Isn't this an ABI breakage?
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists