[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <paqvsxwf3v5hi7gwylfez4yddlswsem27hzqy37mxuapn7dxss@5vefpyohwlba>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 11:06:30 +0100
From: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
To: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, Xuefeng Li <lixuefeng@...ngson.cn>,
Julian Sun <sunjunchao@...edance.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] writeback: Fix wakeup and logging timeouts for
!DETECT_HUNG_TASK
On Tue 03-02-26 17:40:14, Huacai Chen wrote:
> Recent changes of fs-writeback cause such warnings if DETECT_HUNG_TASK
> is not enabled:
>
> INFO: The task sync:1342 has been waiting for writeback completion for more than 1 seconds.
>
> The reason is sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs is 0 when DETECT_HUNG_TASK
> is not enabled, then it causes the warning message even if the writeback
> lasts for only one second.
>
> Guard the wakeup and logging with "#ifdef CONFIG_DETECT_HUNG_TASK" can
> eliminate the warning messages. But on the other hand, it is possible
> that sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs be also 0 when DETECT_HUNG_TASK is
> enabled. So let's just check the value of sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs
> to decide whether do wakeup and logging.
>
> Fixes: 1888635532fb ("writeback: Wake up waiting tasks when finishing the writeback of a chunk.")
> Fixes: d6e621590764 ("writeback: Add logging for slow writeback (exceeds sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)")
> Signed-off-by: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...ngson.cn>
Looks good. Feel free to add:
Reviewed-by: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
> ---
> V2: Disable wakeup and logging for !DETECT_HUNG_TASK.
> V3: Also handle the case for DETECT_HUNG_TASK if sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs is 0.
Good catch!
Honza
>
> fs/fs-writeback.c | 9 +++++----
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/fs-writeback.c b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> index 5444fc706ac7..79b02ac66ac6 100644
> --- a/fs/fs-writeback.c
> +++ b/fs/fs-writeback.c
> @@ -198,10 +198,11 @@ static void wb_queue_work(struct bdi_writeback *wb,
>
> static bool wb_wait_for_completion_cb(struct wb_completion *done)
> {
> + unsigned long timeout = sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs;
> unsigned long waited_secs = (jiffies - done->wait_start) / HZ;
>
> done->progress_stamp = jiffies;
> - if (waited_secs > sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs)
> + if (timeout && (waited_secs > timeout))
> pr_info("INFO: The task %s:%d has been waiting for writeback "
> "completion for more than %lu seconds.",
> current->comm, current->pid, waited_secs);
> @@ -1944,6 +1945,7 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
> .range_end = LLONG_MAX,
> };
> unsigned long start_time = jiffies;
> + unsigned long timeout = sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs;
> long write_chunk;
> long total_wrote = 0; /* count both pages and inodes */
> unsigned long dirtied_before = jiffies;
> @@ -2030,9 +2032,8 @@ static long writeback_sb_inodes(struct super_block *sb,
> __writeback_single_inode(inode, &wbc);
>
> /* Report progress to inform the hung task detector of the progress. */
> - if (work->done && work->done->progress_stamp &&
> - (jiffies - work->done->progress_stamp) > HZ *
> - sysctl_hung_task_timeout_secs / 2)
> + if (work->done && work->done->progress_stamp && timeout &&
> + (jiffies - work->done->progress_stamp) > HZ * timeout / 2)
> wake_up_all(work->done->waitq);
>
> wbc_detach_inode(&wbc);
> --
> 2.47.3
>
--
Jan Kara <jack@...e.com>
SUSE Labs, CR
Powered by blists - more mailing lists