[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYHhO7pJPEew7QMC@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2026 13:51:23 +0200
From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>
To: Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
David Jander <david@...tonic.nl>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 06/13] iio: dac: ds4424: use device match data for
chip info
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 11:17:42AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 12:03:23PM +0200, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 10:34:26AM +0100, Oleksij Rempel wrote:
...
> > > - indio_dev->name = id->name;
> >
> > > + indio_dev->name = client->name;
> >
> > Isn't this an ABI breakage?
>
> I can't confirm it.
>
> before all patches:
> root@...troKit:~ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device3/name
> ds4424
>
> after:
> root@...troKit:~ cat /sys/bus/iio/devices/iio:device3/name
> ds4424
In ACPI case it might look differently, but I have no means to test this.
id->name comes strictly from an i2c table, while client->name is constructed
using specifics of the firmware enumeration. In DT due to some (historical?)
reasons the client->name has no vendor substring and hence matches 1:1 to
id->name. In ACPI, IIRC, the client->name is ACPI device instance name,
something like ABCD0123:00.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists