[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAofZF46ViRF6qv=AEf1mMW-58eTPE0bNvkN=FbL_4j_DMfjZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 14:36:49 +0100
From: Marco Crivellari <marco.crivellari@...e.com>
To: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@...nel.org>, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>, Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] replace system_unbound_wq and system_wq with the new wqs
On Wed, Feb 4, 2026 at 12:58 PM Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de> wrote:
> [...]
> From the description, I've found it hard to see if there's a change in
> semantics here. But this series is effectively about renaming AFAICT. If so,
>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>
>
> for all patches.
Hi Thomas,
The new version of the changelog is more clear then this one. In case you
want a cleaner version I can submit a new version.
Anyhow yes, in short the change is the introduction of system_percpu_wq
and system_dfl_wq without changing the behavior:
system_wq -> system_percpu_wq
system_unbound_wq -> system_dfl_wq
Many thanks!
--
Marco Crivellari
L3 Support Engineer
Powered by blists - more mailing lists