[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <65f86149-eafe-4f83-ac18-f3aedd516152@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:30:30 -0500
From: Chuck Lever <chuck.lever@...cle.com>
To: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
NeilBrown <neil@...wn.name>, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
llvm@...ts.linux.dev
Cc: Trond Myklebust <trondmy@...nel.org>, Anna Schumaker <anna@...nel.org>,
Olga Kornievskaia <okorniev@...hat.com>, Dai Ngo <Dai.Ngo@...cle.com>,
Tom Talpey <tom@...pey.com>, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>, Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>, Simon Horman <horms@...nel.org>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>,
Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>,
Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] sunrpc: Fix `make W=1` build issues
On 2/4/26 9:28 AM, Jeff Layton wrote:
> On Wed, 2026-02-04 at 10:41 +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> Compiler is not happy about unused variables (especially when
>> dprintk() call is defined as no-op). Here is the series to
>> address the issues.
>>
>> Changelog v2:
>> - added patch to kill RPC_IFDEBUG() macro (LKP, Geert)
>> - united separate patches in the series
>> - collected tags (Geert)
>>
>> v1: 20260204010402.2149563-1-andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
>> v1: 20260204010415.2149607-1-andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com
>>
>> Andy Shevchenko (3):
>> nfs/blocklayout: Fix compilation error (`make W=1`) in
>> bl_write_pagelist()
>> sunrpc: Kill RPC_IFDEBUG()
>> sunrpc: Fix compilation error (`make W=1`) when dprintk() is no-op
>>
>> fs/lockd/svclock.c | 5 +++++
>> fs/nfs/blocklayout/blocklayout.c | 4 +---
>> fs/nfsd/nfsfh.c | 9 +++++---
>> include/linux/sunrpc/debug.h | 10 +++++----
>> net/sunrpc/xprtrdma/svc_rdma_transport.c | 27 ++++++++++++------------
>> 5 files changed, 32 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
> These all look like good changes to me. The first patch should go to
> Trond/Anna and Chuck will probably pick up the other two?
That's what I was thinking, as long as there aren't any dependencies
between 1/3 and the others.
> Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>
--
Chuck Lever
Powered by blists - more mailing lists