[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260204145614.UgtBZzv9@linutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 15:56:14 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: "Wysocki, Rafael J" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the tip tree with the pm tree
On 2026-02-04 15:48:33 [+0100], Wysocki, Rafael J wrote:
> On 2/4/2026 2:52 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Today's linux-next merge of the tip tree got a conflict in:
> >
> > drivers/thermal/qcom/lmh.c
> >
> > between commit:
> >
> > 80883ce8b1fd2 ("thermal/drivers/qcom/lmh: Remove spurious IRQF_ONESHOT")
>
> I'll drop this one because I think that it's better to use IRQF_NO_THREAD in
> that driver.
I second this. IRQF_NO_THREAD should be used.
> Thanks!
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists