[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <68908c06-390e-4717-bab2-708de7f5cec4@oss.qualcomm.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 17:41:46 +0100
From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@....qualcomm.com>
To: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@....qualcomm.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
bjorn.andersson@....qualcomm.com, dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com
Cc: prasad.sodagudi@....qualcomm.com, mukesh.savaliya@....qualcomm.com,
quic_vtanuku@...cinc.com, aniket.randive@....qualcomm.com,
chandana.chiluveru@....qualcomm.com, jyothi.seerapu@....qualcomm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] spi: geni-qcom: Add target abort support
On 2/4/26 5:28 PM, Praveen Talari wrote:
> SPI target mode currently lacks a mechanism to gracefully abort ongoing
> transfers when the client or core needs to cancel active transactions.
>
> Implement spi_geni_target_abort() to handle aborting SPI target
> operations when the client and core want to cancel ongoing transfers.
> This provides a mechanism for graceful termination of active SPI
> transactions in target mode.
>
> Signed-off-by: Praveen Talari <praveen.talari@....qualcomm.com>
> ---
> v1->v2
> - Removed unused param from time out handlers.
> ---
> drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
> index 5077dc041e3a..43ce47f2454c 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
> @@ -1003,6 +1003,17 @@ static irqreturn_t geni_spi_isr(int irq, void *data)
> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> }
>
> +static int spi_geni_target_abort(struct spi_controller *spi)
> +{
> + if (!spi->cur_msg)
> + return 0;
> +
> + handle_se_timeout(spi);
> + spi_finalize_current_transfer(spi);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> static int spi_geni_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> int ret, irq;
> @@ -1076,6 +1087,9 @@ static int spi_geni_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> init_completion(&mas->rx_reset_done);
> spin_lock_init(&mas->lock);
>
> + if (spi->target)
> + spi->target_abort = spi_geni_target_abort;
The same check is made in core:
spi_target_abort()
-> spi_controller_is_target()
So I'm assuming the intention was to allow assigning the func pointer
indiscriminately. Other drivers seem to do it both ways.
Mark, any specific preference?
Konrad
Powered by blists - more mailing lists