linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] wifi: nxpwifi: create nxpwifi to support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3eaf27a486a80012b0be116e847f2e93f162aa1e.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2026 21:09:25 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Jeff Chen <jeff.chen_1@....com>, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, briannorris@...omium.org, 
	francesco@...cini.it, s.hauer@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 00/21] wifi: nxpwifi: create nxpwifi to support

> 
>     Devicetree bindings note
>     ------------------------
> 
>     The previous version included a devicetree binding document for
>     `nxp,iw61x.yaml`. Since Device Tree support for this device is optional
>     and not required for current SDIO-based bring-up, the binding has been
>     dropped from this series. A proper schema will be submitted separately
>     once DT usage becomes relevant, so that binding review can be handled
>     in the correct subsystem and without blocking this driver introduction.

You should probably have dropped _all_ the DT/OF *code* as well,
otherwise what's the point of dropping the binding review when you still
bake the binding into the code, no?

johannes