[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYPBXTrREaaXZIdM@zenone.zhora.eu>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 23:06:17 +0100
From: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@...nel.org>
To: Francesco Lavra <flavra@...libre.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] i2c: Add FTDI FT4222H USB I2C adapter
Hi Francesco,
...
> +static int ft4222_i2c_write(struct ft4222_i2c *ftdi, u8 flags, u8 slave_addr,
> + u8 *data, int len)
> +{
> + struct usb_device *udev = ftdi->udev;
> + unsigned int pipe = usb_sndbulkpipe(udev, FT4222_EP_TX);
> + u8 *buf = ftdi->ubuf;
> + int written = 0;
> +
> + dev_dbg(&ftdi->adapter.dev, "write to 0x%02x, flags 0x%02x, len %d",
> + slave_addr, flags, len);
Here and in every dev_dbg/dev_err, you are missing the "\n" at
the end of the message.
> + buf[0] = slave_addr << 1;
> + buf[2] = buf[3] = 0;
> + do {
> + int pkt_len = min(FT4222_TX_HDRLEN + len - written,
> + FT4222_BULK_MAXLEN);
> + bool first_pkt = (written == 0);
> + bool last_pkt = (written + pkt_len == FT4222_TX_HDRLEN + len);
> + int ret, actual_len;
> +
> + buf[1] = 0;
> + if (first_pkt)
> + buf[1] |= flags & FT4222_FLAG_RESTART;
Aren't we losing the _START case here?
Andi
> + if (last_pkt)
> + buf[1] |= flags & FT4222_FLAG_STOP;
> + if (buf[1] == 0)
> + buf[1] = FT4222_FLAG_NONE;
> + memcpy(buf + FT4222_TX_HDRLEN, data + written,
> + pkt_len - FT4222_TX_HDRLEN);
> + ret = usb_bulk_msg(udev, pipe, buf, pkt_len, &actual_len,
> + FT4222_IO_TIMEOUT);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + if (actual_len < pkt_len)
> + return -EIO;
> + ret = ft4222_i2c_get_status(ftdi);
> + if (ret < 0)
> + return ret;
> + written += pkt_len - FT4222_TX_HDRLEN;
> + } while (written < len);
> + return 0;
> +}
Powered by blists - more mailing lists