[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYMUp6maC70zDrAP@pie>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 09:43:03 +0000
From: Yao Zi <me@...ao.cc>
To: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@...c.iscas.ac.cn>, ulf.hansson@...aro.org,
adrian.hunter@...el.com, robh@...nel.org, krzk+dt@...nel.org,
conor+dt@...nel.org
Cc: pjw@...nel.org, palmer@...belt.com, aou@...s.berkeley.edu,
linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
gaohan@...as.ac.cn
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] mmc: sdhci-dwcmshc: Add Canaan K230 DWCMSHC
controller support
On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:29:07PM +0800, Jiayu Du wrote:
> Add SDHCI controller driver for Canaan k230 SoC. Implement custom
> sdhci_ops for set_clock, phy init, init and reset.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayu Du <jiayu.riscv@...c.iscas.ac.cn>
> ---
> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c | 247 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 247 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> index 204830b40587..bc427bfbba25 100644
> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-of-dwcmshc.c
...
> +static void dwcmshc_k230_sdhci_set_clock(struct sdhci_host *host, unsigned int clock)
> +{
> + u16 clk;
> +
> + sdhci_set_clock(host, clock);
> +
> + clk = sdhci_readw(host, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> + clk |= SDHCI_PROG_CLOCK_MODE;
> + sdhci_writew(host, clk, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
Why it's necessary to always set SDHCI_PROG_CLOCK_MODE? If it's a vendor
quirk, it deserves a comment to explain what's happening here.
> +}
...
> +static int dwcmshc_k230_phy_init(struct sdhci_host *host)
> +{
> + struct sdhci_pltfm_host *pltfm_host = sdhci_priv(host);
> + struct dwcmshc_priv *priv = sdhci_pltfm_priv(pltfm_host);
> + u32 rxsel = PHY_PAD_RXSEL_3V3;
> + unsigned int timeout = 15000;
> + u32 val;
> + u32 reg;
> +
> + /* reset phy */
> + sdhci_writew(host, 0, PHY_CNFG_R);
> +
> + /* Disable the clock */
> + sdhci_writew(host, 0, SDHCI_CLOCK_CONTROL);
> +
> + if (priv->flags & FLAG_IO_FIXED_1V8)
> + rxsel = PHY_PAD_RXSEL_1V8;
This may be a little nitpick, but the logic looks cleaner to me if you
do
rxsel = priv->flags & FLAG_IO_FIXED_1V8 ?
PHY_PAD_RXSEL_1V8 : PHY_PAD_RXSEL_3V3;
...
> + /* Wait max 150 ms */
> + while (1) {
> + reg = sdhci_readl(host, PHY_CNFG_R);
> + if (reg & FIELD_PREP(PHY_CNFG_PHY_PWRGOOD_MASK, 1))
> + break;
> + if (!timeout)
> + return -ETIMEDOUT;
> + timeout--;
> + usleep_range(10, 15);
> + }
You could use readx_poll_timeout() with sdhci_readl() to simplify this
loop.
> + reg = FIELD_PREP(PHY_CNFG_PAD_SN_MASK, PHY_CNFG_PAD_SN_k230) |
> + FIELD_PREP(PHY_CNFG_PAD_SP_MASK, PHY_CNFG_PAD_SP_k230);
> + sdhci_writel(host, reg, PHY_CNFG_R);
> +
> + /* de-assert the phy */
> + reg |= PHY_CNFG_RSTN_DEASSERT;
> + sdhci_writel(host, reg, PHY_CNFG_R);
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +static int dwcmshc_k230_init(struct device *dev, struct sdhci_host *host,
> + struct dwcmshc_priv *dwc_priv)
> +{
...
> + if (!usb_phy_node) {
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, -ENODEV,
> + "Failed to find k230-usb-phy node\n");
> + }
Please drop the curly braces, if there's only one statement in the body
of an if, they're not necessary. This is also preferred in kernel coding
style,
> Do not unnecessarily use braces where a single statement will do.[1]
Same for branches below.
> + k230_priv->hi_sys_regmap = device_node_to_regmap(usb_phy_node);
> + of_node_put(usb_phy_node);
> + if (IS_ERR(k230_priv->hi_sys_regmap)) {
> + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(k230_priv->hi_sys_regmap),
> + "Failed to get k230-usb-phy regmap\n");
> + }
...
> + host->quirks |= SDHCI_QUIRK_MULTIBLOCK_READ_ACMD12;
Why not set it in sdhci_dwcmshc_k230_data.pdata.quirks?
> + return 0;
> +}
...
> +static const struct dwcmshc_pltfm_data sdhci_dwcmshc_k230_pdata = {
> + .pdata = {
> + .ops = &sdhci_dwcmshc_k230_ops,
> + .quirks = SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN,
> + },
> + .init = dwcmshc_k230_init,
> +};
Best regards,
Yao Zi
[1]: https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/v6.19-rc5/source/Documentation/process/coding-style.rst#L197
Powered by blists - more mailing lists