[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <2026020423-handwash-employed-2176@gregkh>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 10:57:58 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Neel Bullywon <neelb2403@...il.com>
Cc: Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...nel.org>,
greybus-dev@...ts.linaro.org, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: greybus: gbphy: replaced sprintf() with
sysfs_emit()
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 04:22:54PM -0500, Neel Bullywon wrote:
> Replaced sprintf() with sysfs_emit in the protocol_id_show() sysfs
> attribute func to prevent any potential buffer overflows
>
> This is to ensure a kernel-wide migration to safer string formatting
> functions for sysfs handlers
>
> This was compile-tested only (no VM/hardware used)
>
> Signed-off-by: Neel Bullywon <neelb2403@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
> index 60cf09a302a7..55f132b09cee 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/greybus/gbphy.c
> @@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ static ssize_t protocol_id_show(struct device *dev,
> {
> struct gbphy_device *gbphy_dev = to_gbphy_dev(dev);
>
> - return sprintf(buf, "0x%02x\n", gbphy_dev->cport_desc->protocol_id);
> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "0x%02x\n", gbphy_dev->cport_desc->protocol_id);
As Dan said, this really isn't a needed change. sysfs_emit() is great
for new sysfs files, but for existing ones, sprintf() is just fine.
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists