lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <xfl4fir3l7ckh66zok46uot3xd63jptnyb5f3wsw7cok4rtqsh@23vlnfukpoi5>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 12:32:14 +0200
From: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com>
To: Krishna Kurapati <krishna.kurapati@....qualcomm.com>
Cc: Swati Agarwal <swati.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
        Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Icenowy Zheng <uwu@...nowy.me>,
        Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>,
        Mike Looijmans <mike.looijmans@...ic.nl>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Jens Glathe <jens.glathe@...schoolsolutions.biz>,
        Chaoyi Chen <chaoyi.chen@...k-chips.com>,
        J. Neuschäfer <j.ne@...teo.net>,
        Pin-yen Lin <treapking@...omium.org>,
        Catalin Popescu <catalin.popescu@...ca-geosystems.com>,
        Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>,
        Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] arm64: dts: qcom: lemans-evk: Enable secondary
 USB controller in host mode

On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 11:26:37AM +0530, Krishna Kurapati wrote:
> 
> 
> On 2/4/2026 7:03 AM, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 27, 2026 at 10:53:46AM +0530, Swati Agarwal wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 4:02 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > > <dmitry.baryshkov@....qualcomm.com> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Thu, Jan 22, 2026 at 02:58:52PM +0530, Swati Agarwal wrote:
> > > > > Enable secondary USB controller in host mode on lemans EVK Platform.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Secondary USB controller is connected to a Genesys Logic USB HUB GL3590
> > > > > having 4 ports. The ports of hub that are present on lemans EVK standalone
> > > > > board are used as follows:-
> > > > > 1) port-1 is connected to HD3SS3220 Type-C port controller.
> > > > > 2) port-4 is used for the M.2 E key on corekit. Standard core kit uses UART
> > > > > for Bluetooth. This port is to be used only if user optionally replaces the
> > > > > WiFi card with the NFA765 chip which uses USB for Bluetooth.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Remaining 2 ports will become functional when the interface plus mezzanine
> > > > > board is stacked on top of corekit:
> > > > > 
> > > > > 3) port-2 is connected to another hub which is present on the mezz through
> > > > > which 4 type-A ports are connected.
> > > > > 4) port-3 is used for the M.2 B key for a 5G card when the mezz is
> > > > > connected.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Mark the second USB controller as host only capable and add the HD3SS3220
> > > > > Type-C port controller along with Type-c connector for controlling vbus
> > > > > supply.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Swati Agarwal <swati.agarwal@....qualcomm.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >   arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts | 208 ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > >   1 file changed, 208 insertions(+)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts
> > > > > index 074a1edd0334..a549f7fe53a1 100644
> > > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts
> > > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/lemans-evk.dts
> > > > > @@ -68,6 +68,45 @@ usb0_con_ss_ep: endpoint {
> > > > >                };
> > > > >        };
> > > > > 
> > > > > +     connector-1 {
> > > > > +             compatible = "usb-c-connector";
> > > > > +             label = "USB1-Type-C";
> > > > > +             data-role = "host";
> > > > > +             power-role = "source";
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             vbus-supply = <&vbus_supply_regulator_1>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             ports {
> > > > > +                     #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > > +                     #size-cells = <0>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                     port@0 {
> > > > > +                             reg = <0>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                             usb1_con_ss_ep: endpoint {
> > > > 
> > > > This contradicts USB-C connector bindings. Why?
> > > > 
> > > > > +                                     remote-endpoint = <&hd3ss3220_1_in_ep>;
> > > > > +                             };
> > > > > +                     };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                     port@1 {
> > > > > +                             reg = <1>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                             usb1_hs_in: endpoint {
> > > > > +                                     remote-endpoint = <&usb_hub_2_1>;
> > > > > +                             };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                     };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                     port@2 {
> > > > > +                             reg = <2>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                             usb1_ss_in: endpoint {
> > > > 
> > > > port@2 is for the SBU signals. It can't be connected to the hub.
> > > > 
> > > > > +                                     remote-endpoint = <&usb_hub_3_1>;
> > > > > +                             };
> > > > > +                     };
> > > > > +             };
> > > > > +     };
> > > > > +
> > > > >        edp0-connector {
> > > > >                compatible = "dp-connector";
> > > > >                label = "EDP0";
> > > > > @@ -141,6 +180,16 @@ vbus_supply_regulator_0: regulator-vbus-supply-0 {
> > > > >                enable-active-high;
> > > > >        };
> > > > > 
> > > > > +     vbus_supply_regulator_1: regulator-vbus-supply-1 {
> > > > > +             compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > > > > +             regulator-name = "vbus_supply_1";
> > > > > +             gpio = <&expander1 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > > +             regulator-min-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > > > > +             regulator-max-microvolt = <5000000>;
> > > > > +             regulator-boot-on;
> > > > > +             enable-active-high;
> > > > > +     };
> > > > > +
> > > > >        vmmc_sdc: regulator-vmmc-sdc {
> > > > >                compatible = "regulator-fixed";
> > > > > 
> > > > > @@ -536,6 +585,39 @@ hd3ss3220_0_out_ep: endpoint {
> > > > >                        };
> > > > >                };
> > > > >        };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +     usb-typec@47 {
> > > > > +             compatible = "ti,hd3ss3220";
> > > > > +             reg = <0x47>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             interrupts-extended = <&pmm8654au_2_gpios 6 IRQ_TYPE_EDGE_FALLING>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             id-gpios = <&tlmm 51 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             pinctrl-0 = <&usb1_id>, <&usb1_intr>;
> > > > > +             pinctrl-names = "default";
> > > > > +
> > > > > +             ports {
> > > > > +                     #address-cells = <1>;
> > > > > +                     #size-cells = <0>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                     port@0 {
> > > > > +                             reg = <0>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                             hd3ss3220_1_in_ep: endpoint {
> > > > > +                                     remote-endpoint = <&usb1_con_ss_ep>;
> > > > > +                             };
> > > > > +                     };
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                     port@1 {
> > > > > +                             reg = <1>;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +                             hd3ss3220_1_out_ep: endpoint {
> > > > > +                             };
> > > > 
> > > > Why is this port disconnected? It it really N/C?
> > > 
> > > Hi Dmitry,
> > > 
> > > Sorry for the confusion, Can we do it as follows:
> > > 
> > > hub:                    Hd3ss3220   typec-connector
> > > 
> > > usb_hub_2_1 <-> port@1       port@1 <-> empty
> > > usb_hub_3_1 <-> port@2       port@2 <-> <empty>
> > >                               port@0 <-> port@0
> > > 
> > 
> > You still missed the _why_. Why port@1 of HD3SS3220 is not connected?
> > 
> 
> There are no remote endpoints added in dwc3 node. Since we are making
> dr_mode host. Hence keeping this remore endpoint empty.

How is the link between HD3SS3220 and Type-C affected by the DWC3? What
does port@1 of it represent? Do we have SS lanes between HD3SS3220 and
the connector?

-- 
With best wishes
Dmitry

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ