[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYKc3yFmlZzKG3wr@yjaykim-PowerEdge-T330>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 10:11:59 +0900
From: YoungJun Park <youngjun.park@....com>
To: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>
Cc: akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chrisl@...nel.org, kasong@...cent.com,
hannes@...xchg.org, mhocko@...nel.org, roman.gushchin@...ux.dev,
shakeel.butt@...ux.dev, muchun.song@...ux.dev,
shikemeng@...weicloud.com, nphamcs@...il.com, bhe@...hat.com,
baohua@...nel.org, cgroups@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gunho.lee@....com,
taejoon.song@....com, youngjun.park@....com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] mm: memcontrol: add interface for swap tier
selection
On Tue, Feb 03, 2026 at 11:54:41AM +0100, Michal Koutný wrote:
> Hi.
>
> This is merely the API feedback.
>
> (Feedback to the propsed form, I'm not sure whether/how this should
> interact with memory.swap.max (formally cf io.weight).)
>
> On Sat, Jan 31, 2026 at 09:54:52PM +0900, Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@....com> wrote:
> > This patch integrates the swap tier infrastructure with cgroup,
> > enabling the selection of specific swap devices per cgroup by
> > configuring allowed swap tiers.
> >
> > The new `memory.swap.tiers` interface controls allowed swap tiers via a mask.
> > By default, the mask is set to include all tiers, allowing specific tiers to
> > be excluded or restored. Note that effective tiers are calculated separately
> > using a dedicated mask to respect the cgroup hierarchy. Consequently,
> > configured tiers may differ from effective ones, as they must be a subset
> > of the parent's.
> >
> > Note that cgroups do not pin swap tiers. This is similar to the
> > `cpuset` controller, which does not prevent CPU hotplug. This
> > approach ensures flexibility by allowing tier configuration changes
> > regardless of cgroup usage.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Youngjun Park <youngjun.park@....com>
> > ---
> > Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst | 27 ++++++++
> > include/linux/memcontrol.h | 3 +-
> > mm/memcontrol.c | 85 +++++++++++++++++++++++
> > mm/swap_state.c | 6 +-
> > mm/swap_tier.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-
> > mm/swap_tier.h | 39 ++++++++++-
> > mm/swapfile.c | 4 ++
> > 7 files changed, 246 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > index 7f5b59d95fce..776a908ce1b9 100644
> > --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/cgroup-v2.rst
> > @@ -1848,6 +1848,33 @@ The following nested keys are defined.
> > Swap usage hard limit. If a cgroup's swap usage reaches this
> > limit, anonymous memory of the cgroup will not be swapped out.
> >
> > + memory.swap.tiers
> > + A read-write nested-keyed file which exists on non-root
>
> "nested-keyed" format is something else in this document's lingo, see
> e.g. io.stat.
>
> I think you wanted to make this resemble cgroup.subtree_control (which
> is fine).
You are right, I used the wrong expression.
Simply describing it as a "file" seems sufficient.
>
> > + cgroups. The default is to enable all tiers.
> > +
> > + This interface allows selecting which swap tiers a cgroup can
> > + use for swapping out memory.
> > +
> > + The effective tiers are inherited from the parent. Only tiers
> > + effective in the parent can be effective in the child. However,
> > + the child can explicitly disable tiers allowed by the parent.
> > +
> > + When read, the file shows two lines:
> > + - The first line shows the operation string that was
> > + written to this file.
> > + - The second line shows the effective operation after
> > + merging with parent settings.
>
> The convention (in cpuset) is to split it in two files like
> memory.swap.tiers and memory.swap.tiers.effective.
I will separate the two according to the convention.
Thanks for correction.
> > +
> > + When writing, the format is:
> > + (+/-)(TIER_NAME) (+/-)(TIER_NAME) ...
> > +
> > + Valid tier names are those configured in
> > + /sys/kernel/mm/swap/tiers.
> > +
> > + Each tier can be prefixed with:
> > + + Enable this tier
> > + - Disable this tier
> > +
>
> I believe these are only superficial adjustments not affecting the
> implementation.
>
> Thanks,
> Michal
Thanks for the review, Michal.
Youngjun Park
Powered by blists - more mailing lists