[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8e86beb-5025-4d33-9ee4-0b9e8155c345@kernel.dk>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 06:42:22 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: jonghwi.rha@...sung.com
Cc: "linux-block@...r.kernel.org" <linux-block@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"hch@....de" <hch@....de>, 김정태
<jt1217.kim@...sung.com>, 정혜연 <hyeon.chung@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] bsg: initialize request and reply payloads in
bsg_prepare_job
On 2/4/26 10:32 PM, ??? wrote:
> bsg: initialize request and reply payloads in bsg_prepare_job
>
> struct bsg_job payloads contain fields that are only populated by
> certain commands, such as sg_list pointers.
>
> Because struct bsg_job is allocated with kmalloc(), memory may be
> reused across requests. If a command does not populate all payload
> fields, stale state from a previous job may remain and later be
> misinterpreted during cleanup, potentially leading to use-after-free
> or double-free issues.
>
> Initialize both request and reply payloads at the beginning of job
> preparation to ensure a clean state for all commands.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonghwi Rha <jonghwi.rha@...sung.com>
>
> diff --git a/block/bsg-lib.c b/block/bsg-lib.c
> index 32da4a4429ce..0fbf8e311c03 100644
> --- a/block/bsg-lib.c
> +++ b/block/bsg-lib.c
> @@ -234,6 +234,12 @@ static bool bsg_prepare_job(struct device *dev, struct request *req)
> struct bsg_job *job = blk_mq_rq_to_pdu(req);
> int ret;
>
> + /* Clear stale SG state since bsg_job is reused as a request PDU */
> + job->request_payload.sg_list = NULL;
> + job->request_payload.sg_cnt = 0;
> + job->reply_payload.sg_list = NULL;
> + job->reply_payload.sg_cnt = 0;
> +
> job->timeout = req->timeout;
>
> if (req->bio) {
The patch is white-space damaged, tabs are spaces. But I can fix that
up. Do we just want to do a memset(job, 0, sizeof(*job)) here to avoid
any oddities like this in the future?
--
Jens Axboe
Powered by blists - more mailing lists