lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b0ff5675-bb6a-47e6-8cca-ed741db1edfb@web.de>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 15:43:21 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Chris Spencer <spencercw@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
 Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
 Vasileios Amoiridis <vassilisamir@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [v2] iio: chemical: bme680: Fix measurement wait duration
 calculation

>> * See also once more:
>>   + https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst?h=v6.19-rc8#n94
> 
> Can you please clarify what is wrong with the commit message? I have
> used the imperative mood in the subject, but the rest of the message
> is simply background information. How would you suggest rewording
> this?

I propose to mention another action in the change description.

Possible wording:
Thus adjust an inappropriate value.

Regards,
Markus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ