[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <437592e6-460d-435d-bd83-7ff8222a6130@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 22:30:31 +0530
From: Harshit Mogalapalli <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...el.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libre.com>,
Nuno Sá <nuno.sa@...log.com>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@...nel.org>,
Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@...log.com>,
Andrew Ijano <andrew.ijano@...il.com>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
David Lechner <dlechner@...libe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 next 7/7] iio: sca3000: manage device registration with
devm helper
Hi Andy,
On 05/02/26 22:26, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 6:51 PM Harshit Mogalapalli
> <harshit.m.mogalapalli@...cle.com> wrote:
>> On 05/02/26 21:59, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>>> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 05:12:13AM -0800, Harshit Mogalapalli wrote:
>
> ...
>
>>>> - struct iio_dev *indio_dev = spi_get_drvdata(spi);
>>>
>>> Do you still need spi_set_drvdata() or analogue in the ->probe()?
>>>
>>
>> That's a great catch, I don't see spi_get_drvdata() anymore after this
>> series, so yes I think we should get rid of this.
>>
>> Should I fold that into this patch in v6, as spi_get_drvdata() is also
>> removed in this patch ?
>
> Ideally it should be done in this patch, but let's wait for Jonathan.
> He usually may tweak these small things when applying.
>
Also, while checking the patch now, I see I copied a wrong tag(RB with
missing r in baylibre from [1])
So that's one more thing to fix. Let me know if v6 would be a preferred
approach, I can do it.
Thanks,
Harshit
[1]
https://lore.kernel.org/all/a5fa2f97-9ba3-4085-bfaf-a255d24a81f0@baylibre.com/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists