linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] powerpc: Enable Rust for ppc64le

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANiq72mqVNGJSFAm2UhjXRV=5cWQ1Z4xN2aVeYQ5Tn-veym3+g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 21:15:32 +0100
From: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@...il.com>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org>
Cc: Mukesh Kumar Chaurasiya <mkchauras@...il.com>, Jubilee Young <workingjubilee@...il.com>, 
	Nick Desaulniers <nick.desaulniers+lkml@...il.com>, Bill Wendling <morbo@...gle.com>, 
	Justin Stitt <justinstitt@...gle.com>, Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@...ux.ibm.com>, 
	Link Mauve <linkmauve@...kmauve.fr>, ojeda@...nel.org, boqun.feng@...il.com, 
	gary@...yguo.net, bjorn3_gh@...tonmail.com, lossin@...nel.org, 
	a.hindborg@...nel.org, aliceryhl@...gle.com, tmgross@...ch.edu, 
	dakr@...nel.org, corbet@....net, maddy@...ux.ibm.com, mpe@...erman.id.au, 
	npiggin@...il.com, chleroy@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, 
	jpoimboe@...nel.org, jbaron@...mai.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, ardb@...nel.org, 
	rust-for-linux@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org, 
	clang-built-linux <llvm@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 3/3] powerpc: Enable Rust for ppc64le

On Thu, Feb 5, 2026 at 9:02 PM Nathan Chancellor <nathan@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> Thanks for the CC, I had not seen that issue. LLVM 22 is currently in
> the -rc phase and I see that the fix has been merged into the
> release/22.x branch as of yesterday so it should be in LLVM 21.1.0-rc3
> when it get released on February 10. LLVM 21.1.8 was the last release of
> the 21.x series (hard to keep up with all the numbers...) and it sounds
> like this is only a regression from the LLVM 22 development cycle.

Yeah, sorry, mixed up 21.1.9 with the potential 22.1.9 in summer this year, bah!

Fixed my comment in the issue to avoid confusion.

Thanks!

Cheers,
Miguel