linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3bde6a06-dcce-42a5-b97e-a44072330462@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 20:52:14 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Josua Mayer <josua@...id-run.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mmc tree

On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 08:28:58PM +0000, Josua Mayer wrote:
> On 2/5/26 22:11, Josua Mayer wrote:

> > Any ideas?

> Looks like my mistake, I wrongly assumed that CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER
> would be defined in both cases MULTIPLEXER=y or =m.
> Sorry about the noise :(

> Instead I should have used IS_ENABLED macro:

Yes, exactly - IIRC the module ends up as CONFIG_MULTIPLEXER_MODULE or
something.  Common gotcha :(

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)