linux-kernel - [PATCH v1 2/2] perf test addr2line_inlines: Ensure inline information shows on LBR leaves

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260205205622.530825-2-irogers@google.com>
Date: Thu,  5 Feb 2026 12:56:22 -0800
From: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, 
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>, Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>, 
	Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...nel.org>, 
	Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>, Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>, 
	James Clark <james.clark@...aro.org>, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>, 
	"Krzysztof Łopatowski" <krzysztof.m.lopatowski@...il.com>, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org, 
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Dapeng Mi <dapeng1.mi@...ux.intel.com>, 
	Weilin Wang <weilin.wang@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/2] perf test addr2line_inlines: Ensure inline information
 shows on LBR leaves

Expand the addr2line inline function testing to also run for an LBR
callchain, skipping if LBR support isn't present.

Signed-off-by: Ian Rogers <irogers@...gle.com>
---
 tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh
index ce30d9c7e0bf..e8754ef2d7f2 100755
--- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh
+++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/addr2line_inlines.sh
@@ -61,8 +61,36 @@ test_dwarf() {
     fi
 }
 
+test_lbr() {
+    echo "Inline unwinding LBR verification test"
+    if [ ! -f /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu/caps/branches ] &&
+       [ ! -f /sys/bus/event_source/devices/cpu_core/caps/branches ]
+    then
+        echo "Skip: only x86 CPUs support LBR"
+        return
+    fi
+
+    # Record data. Currently only dwarf callchains support inlined functions.
+    perf record --call-graph lbr -e cycles:u -o "${perf_data}" -- perf test -w inlineloop 1
+
+    # Check output with inline (default) and srcline
+    perf script -i "${perf_data}" --fields +srcline > "${perf_script_txt}"
+
+    # Expect the leaf and middle functions to occur on lines in the 20s, with
+    # the non-inlined parent function on a line in the 30s.
+    if grep -q "inlineloop.c:2. (inlined)" "${perf_script_txt}" &&
+       grep -q "inlineloop.c:3.$" "${perf_script_txt}"
+    then
+        echo "Inline unwinding lbr verification test [Success]"
+    else
+        echo "Inline unwinding lbr verification test [Failed missing inlined functions]"
+        err=1
+    fi
+}
+
 test_fp
 test_dwarf
+test_lbr
 
 cleanup
 exit $err
-- 
2.53.0.rc2.204.g2597b5adb4-goog