lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <945064a3-b6ae-4257-afd7-5229cf8267a9@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 21:13:39 -0800
From: Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>
To: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Cc: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>,
 lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
 David Hildenbrand <david@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
 hannes@...xchg.org, riel@...riel.com, shakeel.butt@...ux.dev,
 baohua@...nel.org, dev.jain@....com, baolin.wang@...ux.alibaba.com,
 npache@...hat.com, Liam.Howlett@...cle.com, ryan.roberts@....com,
 vbabka@...e.cz, lance.yang@...ux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
 kernel-team@...a.com
Subject: Re: [RFC 01/12] mm: add PUD THP ptdesc and rmap support



On 04/02/2026 20:21, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 04:17:19AM +0000, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
>> Why are you even talking about "the next series"?  The approach is
>> wrong.  You need to put this POC aside and solve the problems that
>> you've bypassed to create this POC.


Ah is the issue the code duplication that Lorenzo has raised (ofcourse
completely agree that there is quite a bit), the lru.next patch I did
which hopefully [1] makes better, or investigating if it might be
interferring with DAX/VFIO that Lorenzo pointed out (will ofcourse
investigate before sending the next revision)? The mapcount work
(I think David is working on this?) that is needed to allow splitting
PUDs to PMD is completely a separate issue and can be tackled in parallel
to this.

> 
> ... and gmail is rejecting this email as being spam.  You need to stop
> using gmail for kernel deveopment work.

I asked a couple of folks now and it seems they got it without any issue.
I have used it for a long time. I will try and see if something has changed.

[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/05d5918f-b61b-4091-b8c6-20eebfffc3c4@gmail.com/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ