[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID:
<TY4PR01MB142828D6A83F85B08D85D3EB98299A@TY4PR01MB14282.jpnprd01.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 07:51:33 +0000
From: Michael Dege <michael.dege@...esas.com>
To: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>, Yoshihiro Shimoda
<yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>, Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH net] net: renesas: rswitch: fix forwarding offload
statemachine
Hello Nikita,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nikita Yushchenko <nikita.yoush@...entembedded.com>
> Sent: Thursday, February 5, 2026 8:47 AM
> To: Michael Dege <michael.dege@...esas.com>; Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@...esas.com>;
> Andrew Lunn <andrew+netdev@...n.ch>; David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>; Eric Dumazet
> <edumazet@...gle.com>; Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>; Paolo Abeni <pabeni@...hat.com>
> Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org; linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: renesas: rswitch: fix forwarding offload statemachine
>
> Hello Michael
>
> > - } else if (rdev->forwarding_offloaded) {
> > + } else if (rdev->forwarding_offloaded &&
> > + !rdev->forwarding_requested) {
> > rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
> > }
>
> Although indeed the condition in the current code is not correct, I'm not sure comfortable with this
> fix.
>
> Full condition for a port to be a valid candidate for hardware forwarding is
>
> rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested
>
> It is not obvious if at this point rdev_for_l2_offload() could get changed from the last call to
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(), so using only the partial condition at this point does not look
> good for me.
>
> I'd suggest to either change to something like
>
> if (rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested && !rdev->forwarding_offloaded)
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, true, false); if (!(rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev-
> >forwarding_requested) && rdev->forwarding_offloaded)
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
>
> Or maybe just
>
> if (rdev_for_l2_offload() && rdev->forwarding_requested)
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, true, false); else
> rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading(rdev, false, false);
>
> since rswitch_change_l2_hw_offloading() has internal check for the current state and returns early if
> the requested change is already applied.
>
> Nikita
Thank you for your comment.
Let me study and test your suggestion.
Best regards,
Michael
Powered by blists - more mailing lists