[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYRaI0NDq2dIO4QQ@google.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 08:51:47 +0000
From: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
To: Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...nel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>, Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@...g-engineering.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...dia.com>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
chrome-platform@...ts.linux.dev,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>, linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Danilo Krummrich <dakr@...nel.org>,
Bartosz Golaszewski <brgl@...ev.pl>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 04/11] gpio: Ensure struct gpio_chip for
gpiochip_setup_dev()
On Wed, Feb 04, 2026 at 04:36:00AM -0600, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> On Tue, 3 Feb 2026 07:10:51 +0100, Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org> said:
> > Ensure struct gpio_chip for gpiochip_setup_dev(). This eliminates a few
> > checks for struct gpio_chip.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Tzung-Bi Shih <tzungbi@...nel.org>
>
> Same comment as patch 3. I don't like seeing both gpio_chip and gpio_device
> being passed to the same function. If you already dereferenced gpio_chip, pass
> it on its own and get the address of the associated devices from its member
> pointer.
Ack, will fix in the next version.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists