[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f6d4c62f-cf7f-44ef-86f8-ca496e7c8a7b@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 10:43:42 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Antoine Bouyer <antoine.bouyer@....com>, julien.vuillaumier@....com,
alexi.birlinger@....com, daniel.baluta@....com, peng.fan@....com,
frank.li@....com, jacopo.mondi@...asonboard.com,
laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com, mchehab@...nel.org, robh@...nel.org,
krzk+dt@...nel.org, conor+dt@...nel.org, shawnguo@...nel.org,
s.hauer@...gutronix.de, kernel@...gutronix.de, festevam@...il.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v1 05/11] dt-bindings: media: Add nxp neoisp support
On 23/01/2026 09:09, Antoine Bouyer wrote:
> Add dt-bindings for NXP neoisp module.
What is a neoisp module?
>
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Bouyer <antoine.bouyer@....com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,neoisp.yaml | 65 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 65 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,neoisp.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,neoisp.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,neoisp.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..4dc9fa5a03b7
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/media/nxp,neoisp.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/media/nxp,neoisp.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: NXP NEOISP Image Signal Processing Pipeline
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Antoine Bouyer <antoine.bouyer@....com>
> +
> +description:
> + The NXP NEOISP performs a set of image processing tasks on the RAW camera
> + stream and provides RGB or YUV enhanced image.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + enum:
> + - nxp,neoisp
Please read writing bindings document.
> + - nxp,imx95-a0-neoisp
> + - nxp,imx95-a1-neoisp
> + - nxp,imx95-b0-neoisp
Nothing explains me why one SoC has three neoisp. You have entire commit
msg to explain weird things.
> +
> + reg:
> + items:
> + - description: The configuration registers
> + - description: ISP local memories
> +
> + interrupts:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
> + clocks:
> + minItems: 1
maxItems. There is no such syntax like you wrote. Look at other code in
case of doubts.
> +
> + clock-names:
> + items:
> + - const: camcm0
> +
> + power-domains:
> + maxItems: 1
> +
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists