[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <7d5754dd-8cf5-41f3-a767-271b28b1f63c@oracle.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 18:00:39 -0800
From: jane.chu@...cle.com
To: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, "David Hildenbrand (arm)" <david@...nel.org>,
是参差 <shicenci@...il.com>
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linmiaohe@...wei.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: WARNING in memory_failure() at include/linux/huge_mm.h:635
triggered
On 2/4/2026 1:41 PM, Zi Yan wrote:
> On 4 Feb 2026, at 16:37, David Hildenbrand (arm) wrote:
>
>> On 2/4/26 22:08, Zi Yan wrote:
>>> On 4 Feb 2026, at 14:18, David Hildenbrand (arm) wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2/4/26 18:41, Zi Yan wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> More details:
>>>>> later at sg_vma_fault(), the driver just handles a page fault by supplying
>>>>> a subpage from a pre-allocated compound page[3]. We then get a large folio
>>>>> without !CONFIG_TRANSPARENT_HUGEPAGE.
>>>>
>>>> We can identify such non-folio (but compound) things by looking at PG_large_rmappable IIRC.
>>>
>>> OK, back to the issue. The patch below should fix the issue?
>>>
>>> Hi 是参差,
>>>
>>> Can you test it?
>>>
>
> <snip>
>> I think you have to test for folio_test_large() before testing folio_test_large_rmappable().
>
> Oh, forgot that. Thanks.
>
>
> From 8dda4bba9964890462eca3ef3cce57bb4fab8313 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> Date: Wed, 4 Feb 2026 16:04:19 -0500
> Subject: [PATCH] mm/memory_failure: reject unsupported non-folio compound page
>
> Signed-off-by: Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>
> ---
> mm/memory-failure.c | 8 ++++++--
> 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/memory-failure.c b/mm/memory-failure.c
> index 825c706ac576..137c67fda57e 100644
> --- a/mm/memory-failure.c
> +++ b/mm/memory-failure.c
> @@ -2440,9 +2440,13 @@ int memory_failure(unsigned long pfn, int flags)
>
> folio = page_folio(p);
>
> - /* filter pages that are protected from hwpoison test by users */
> + /*
> + * filter pages that are protected from hwpoison test by users
> + * or unsupported non folio compound pages
> + */
> folio_lock(folio);
> - if (hwpoison_filter(p)) {
> + if (hwpoison_filter(p) ||
> + (folio_test_large(folio) && !folio_test_large_rmappable(folio))) {
Just curious, would this filter out pte-mapped THP/mTHP folios?
> ClearPageHWPoison(p);
> folio_unlock(folio);
> folio_put(folio);
thanks,
-jane
Powered by blists - more mailing lists