[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260205-winged-alligator-of-sorcery-aada21@quoll>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 14:07:02 +0100
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>
To: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>
Cc: Andrzej Hajda <andrzej.hajda@...el.com>,
Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@...aro.org>, Robert Foss <rfoss@...nel.org>,
Laurent Pinchart <Laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>, Jonas Karlman <jonas@...boo.se>,
Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...il.com>, David Airlie <airlied@...il.com>,
Simona Vetter <simona@...ll.ch>, Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com>,
Maxime Ripard <mripard@...nel.org>, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@...e.de>,
Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>, Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk+dt@...nel.org>,
Conor Dooley <conor+dt@...nel.org>, Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>,
Bjorn Andersson <andersson@...nel.org>, Konrad Dybcio <konradybcio@...nel.org>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org, Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: display: lt9611: Support single Port
B input
On Wed, Jan 28, 2026 at 07:15:45PM +0800, Hongyang Zhao wrote:
> The LT9611 has two DSI input ports (Port A and Port B). Update the
> binding to clearly document the port mapping and allow using Port B
> alone when DSI is physically connected to Port B only.
>
> Changes:
> - Clarify port@0 corresponds to DSI Port A input
> - Clarify port@1 corresponds to DSI Port B input
> - Change port requirement from mandatory port@0 to anyOf port@...ort@1,
> allowing either port to be used independently
>
> Signed-off-by: Hongyang Zhao <hongyang.zhao@...ndersoft.com>
> Reviewed-by: Roger Shimizu <rosh@...ian.org>
Where did this review happen? V1 had this tag, but the patch was
completely different, which means you were supposed to drop the tag.
Please perform review in public.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
Powered by blists - more mailing lists