[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYSdW2YaJdpgXYos@thinkstation>
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2026 13:43:58 +0000
From: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
To: "David Hildenbrand (Arm)" <david@...nel.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Muchun Song <muchun.song@...ux.dev>, Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Usama Arif <usamaarif642@...il.com>, Frank van der Linden <fvdl@...gle.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@...nel.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@...cle.com>,
Zi Yan <ziy@...dia.com>, Baoquan He <bhe@...hat.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@...nel.org>, WANG Xuerui <kernel@...0n.name>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@...s.berkeley.edu>, Alexandre Ghiti <alex@...ti.fr>, kernel-team@...a.com,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
loongarch@...ts.linux.dev, linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 06/17] LoongArch/mm: Align vmemmap to maximal folio size
On Thu, Feb 05, 2026 at 01:56:36PM +0100, David Hildenbrand (Arm) wrote:
> On 2/4/26 17:56, David Hildenbrand (arm) wrote:
> > On 2/2/26 16:56, Kiryl Shutsemau wrote:
> > > The upcoming change to the HugeTLB vmemmap optimization (HVO) requires
> > > struct pages of the head page to be naturally aligned with regard to the
> > > folio size.
> > >
> > > Align vmemmap to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Kiryl Shutsemau <kas@...nel.org>
> > > ---
> > > arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h | 3 ++-
> > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h b/arch/loongarch/
> > > include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > index c33b3bcb733e..f9416acb9156 100644
> > > --- a/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > +++ b/arch/loongarch/include/asm/pgtable.h
> > > @@ -113,7 +113,8 @@ extern unsigned long empty_zero_page[PAGE_SIZE /
> > > sizeof(unsigned long)];
> > > min(PTRS_PER_PGD * PTRS_PER_PUD * PTRS_PER_PMD * PTRS_PER_PTE
> > > * PAGE_SIZE, (1UL << cpu_vabits) / 2) - PMD_SIZE - VMEMMAP_SIZE -
> > > KFENCE_AREA_SIZE)
> > > #endif
> > > -#define vmemmap ((struct page *)((VMALLOC_END + PMD_SIZE) &
> > > PMD_MASK))
> > > +#define VMEMMAP_ALIGN max(PMD_SIZE, MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES *
> > > sizeof(struct page))
> > > +#define vmemmap ((struct page *)(ALIGN(VMALLOC_END,
> > > VMEMMAP_ALIGN)))
> >
> >
> > Same comment, the "MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct page)" is just
> > black magic here
> > and the description of the situation is wrong.
> >
> > Maybe you want to pull the magic "MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct
> > page)" into the core and call it
> >
> > #define MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN (MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct
> > page))
> >
> > But then special case it base on (a) HVO being configured in an (b) HVO
> > being possible
> >
> > #ifdef HUGETLB_PAGE_OPTIMIZE_VMEMMAP && is_power_of_2(sizeof(struct page)
> > /* A very helpful comment explaining the situation. */
> > #define MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN (MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES * sizeof(struct
> > page))
> > #else
> > #define MAX_FOLIO_VMEMMAP_ALIGN 0
> > #endif
> >
> > Something like that.
> >
>
> Thinking about this ...
>
> the vmemmap start is always struct-page-aligned. Otherwise we'd be in
> trouble already.
>
> Isn't it then sufficient to just align the start to MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES?
>
> Let's assume sizeof(struct page) == 64 and MAX_FOLIO_NR_PAGES = 512 for
> simplicity.
>
> vmemmap start would be multiples of 512 (0x0010000000).
>
> 512, 1024, 1536, 2048 ...
>
> Assume we have an 256-pages folio at 1536+256 = 0x111000000
s/0x/0b/, but okay.
> Assume we have the last page of that folio (0x011111111111), we would just
> get to the start of that folio by AND-ing with ~(256-1).
>
> Which case am I ignoring?
IIUC, you are ignoring the actual size of struct page. It is not 1 byte :P
The last page of this 256-page folio is at 1536+256 + (64 * 255) which
is 0b100011011000000. There's no mask that you can AND that gets you to
0b11100000000.
--
Kiryl Shutsemau / Kirill A. Shutemov
Powered by blists - more mailing lists