linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Implement ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20260206143150-e32f59b4-eaf7-4c2c-ba14-5cd03906bb18@linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 14:32:42 +0100
From: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
To: "Russell King (Oracle)" <linux@...linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, 
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ARM: Implement ARCH_HAS_CC_CAN_LINK

On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 01:29:31PM +0000, Russell King (Oracle) wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 02:02:38PM +0100, Thomas Weißschuh wrote:
> > The generic CC_CAN_LINK detection does not handle different byte orders.
> > This may lead to userprogs which are not actually runnable on the target
> > kernel.
> > 
> > Use architecture-specific logic supporting byte orders instead.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Thomas Weißschuh <thomas.weissschuh@...utronix.de>
> 
> Damn, I've recently merged your v1 patch. Can you send a follow-up
> patch to my patch system please?

Oh, sorry. That was a fast application.

Do you want an incremental patch on top or the full v2?


Thomas