linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] docs: process: maintainer-pgp-guide: update kernel.org docs link

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <95CDB1C3-56CE-4A7A-92F4-AD717BA4C956@amidevlab.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 20:02:50 +0530
From: Amitabh <amitabh@...devlab.com>
To: Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
 workflows@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
 linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] docs: process: maintainer-pgp-guide: update kernel.org
 docs link

Thank you, Konstantin.

Hope you won’t mind giving a "Reviewed-by" to my patch :)


> On 6 Feb 2026, at 7:50 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> 
> On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 12:02:00AM +0530, Amitabh wrote:
>>> I am aware of kernel documentation practices :)  "Typically licensed"
>>> does not tell you what any individual contributor intended, though.
>>> *Probably* that tag is OK, but you should really consult with the
>>> original author of that page to ask what their intent was.
>> 
>> You are absolutely correct. In fact, the original author, Konstantin Ryabitsev,
>> (in TO here) responded to my v1 patch in the affirmative regarding the changes.
>> (https://lore.kernel.org/all/177006480695.901069.1641199463436529014@lemur/)
> 
> Yes, that matches the intended license.
> 
> -K

Regards
Amitabh