[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACzX3AupFeAy0-pPsZ51ixd7qW++LYYjiKBZ3aK5Y2JDrB_JWw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 20:38:13 +0530
From: Anuj gupta <anuj1072538@...il.com>
To: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Cc: linux-block@...r.kernel.org, io-uring@...r.kernel.org,
Vishal Verma <vishal1.verma@...el.com>, tushar.gohad@...el.com,
Keith Busch <kbusch@...nel.org>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
Sagi Grimberg <sagi@...mberg.me>, Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Christian Brauner <brauner@...nel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@...aro.org>, Christian König <christian.koenig@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nvme@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC v2 05/11] block: add infra to handle dmabuf tokens
> +
> + dma_fence_init(&fence->base, &blk_mq_dma_fence_ops, &fence->lock,
> + token->fence_ctx, atomic_inc_return(&token->fence_seq));
> + spin_lock_init(&fence->lock);
nit lock should be initialized before handing its address to
dma_fence_init()
Powered by blists - more mailing lists