[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <aYYIw3h35HOqodAb@casper.infradead.org>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 15:29:07 +0000
From: Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>
To: xu.xin16@....com.cn
Cc: david@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, chengming.zhou@...ux.dev,
hughd@...gle.com, wang.yaxin@....com.cn, yang.yang29@....com.cn,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: ksm: initialize rmap values directly and make them const
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 03:22:54PM +0800, xu.xin16@....com.cn wrote:
> make them const to make code more robust. Besides, since KSM folios are always
> order-0, so folio_nr_pages(KSM folio) is always 1, so the line:
>
> "pgoff_end = pgoff_start + folio_nr_pages(folio) - 1;"
>
> becomes directly:
>
> "pgoff_end = pgoff_start;"
How do you know KSM folios will always be order 0? I don't. NAK this
change.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists