[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20260206153959.GT1282955@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2026 16:39:59 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Valentin Schneider <vschneid@...hat.com>,
Philip Auld <pauld@...hat.com>,
Gabriele Monaco <gmonaco@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sched/deadline: Fix missing ENQUEUE_REPLENISH during PI
de-boosting
On Fri, Feb 06, 2026 at 02:25:52PM +0100, Juri Lelli wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> index 6f10db3646e7f..369e47b4ea863 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/syscalls.c
> @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> * Copyright (C) 1991-2002 Linus Torvalds
> * Copyright (C) 1998-2024 Ingo Molnar, Red Hat
> */
> +#include "linux/sched/rt.h"
> #include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <linux/cpuset.h>
> #include <linux/sched/debug.h>
Is this clangd being 'helpful' ? Or an over eager AI thing? In case of
clangd, add to .clangd:
Completion:
HeaderInsertion: Never
Powered by blists - more mailing lists